The future of digital books

29 March 2011

Publishers can survive and even profit from piracy, argues Peter Ollier, as long as they learn the mistakes from the movie and music industries, and focus on innovation

Like many authors, Kristine Rusch has set up a Google alert in her name. Every time one of her books is uploaded onto a file-sharing site, she knows about it. "File sharing is a touchy subject," she says. "I know a lot of writers who are militantly against having this happen".

Authors everywhere are experiencing the mixed emotions of being happy that their book is so popular that people want to download it, but angry that they are doing so illegally. And the opportunities to download illegally are increasing. It has always been possible to scan and copy books, but for years the biggest anti-piracy device was screen glare. The coming of Kindles, Nooks, iPads and Android tablets has changed that and the temporary halt to Google Books (see box) will not stop the growth of the e-book industry.

Is book publishing another obsolete industry, likely to face fiscal annihilation...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements