Roche loses patent opposition in India

01 June 2010

In another blow to multinational pharmaceutical companies in India, the Chennai Patent Office has invalidated a key patent owned by Swiss drug maker F Hoffmann La Roche, allowing generic competitors to enter the market

Peter Ollier, Hong Kong

In the May 5 decision, S P Subramanian, the assistant controller of patents and designs, said that the patent covering Valcyte (valganciclovir hydrochloride) lacks inventive step and does not demonstrate significantly improved efficacy over previous compounds, as required by India's patent law.

Valcyte is used to prevent infection in people who have undergone organ transplants and in people who suffer from HIV/AIDS.

"This decision raises the huge question of how credible is a patent grant in India – should the courts take a presumption of validity or not?" said Abhai Pandey, of Lex Orbis in New Delhi.

The Chennai Patent Office granted patent (no 207232) on June 29 2007. Six parties, including Indian generics companies Ranbaxy and Cipla and three organisations campaigning for the rights of people with HIV and AIDS, filed a post-grant opposition.

The opponents made a series of claims, including that the invention...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements