Made In Italy rules have positive impact

01 April 2010

Four months after they were introduced, the impact of the recent rules on the protection of Made In Italy is encouraging.

According to the Italian Ministry of Economic Policies, in this short period of time almost 46 million counterfeited goods have been seized.

Before the new law was introduced, the Italian economy had suffered economic damage estimated at €5.28 billion a year.

But the new rules, which also introduced sanctions of up to €250,000, have enormously facilitated the work of the Revenue Corps and Customs Offices in their seizure work and their fight against counterfeits. Since September 2009, the results have been:

  • a 46% increase in the number of people reported to the authorities;
  • a 162% increase in the number of seized goods;
  • a 128% increase in the number of counterfeit fashion goods seized;
  • an 82% increase in seized real estate related to the counterfeit business;
  • the seizure of 23 million items in the fashion sector and 2 million articles of electronic goods; and
  • the seizure of 2.47 million toys and 17.64 million consumer goods items.

These successes have been obtained in the Italian territory alone. But, thanks to the new regulations, many of the operations carried out by the Revenue Corps have been performed on a European level and have enabled the countries through which the counterfeit goods arrive in Italy to be traced.

Micaela Modiano

Modiano & Partners
Via Meravigli 16
Milano I-20123, Italy
Tel: +39 02 85 907 777
Fax: +39 02 863 860
info@modiano.com
www.modiano.com


Bookmarks



INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements