How the EPO got its president

01 April 2010

It took six months and 20 rounds of voting but the Administrative Council of the EPO last month finally chose a successor to out-going president Alison Brimelow

James Nurton and Emma Barraclough, London  

Benoît Battistelli, head of the French IP Office INPI and former chairman of the Admin Council, secured three-quarters of the votes of EPO member states at a meeting on March 1.

National representatives were close to postponing the election of a president for a fourth time, before Battistelli finally and narrowly won the necessary level of support.

Battistelli's success came after his candidacy had gradually built up support during 20 separate votes over the four Council meetings. After the previous vote in February, he was just one short of the required threshold, and was expected to have gathered enough momentum to win the vote comfortably at the fourth attempt.

But, says one Admin Council member: "The [final] vote was not a formality. We had a number of votes that went up and down. It involved very small margins."

The acting chair of...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements