The latest around the Asia-Pacific
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The latest around the Asia-Pacific

Check out Managing IP's latest supplements on the newest developments in the Asia-Pacific region

The IP environment in Asia-Pacific continues to evolve quickly. This year's Asia-Pacific IP Focus delves into the diverse range of issues around the region. Some of the topics covered in this year's Focus include the determination of functional features in patent litigation in China, GUI protection in Japan and the evolution of collective rights management societies in Indonesia.

For readers interested in particular countries, we also have our recently published India IP Focus and Australia Supplement. In the India Focus, we have an interview with Shamnad Basheer, one of Managing IP's 50 most influential people this year discussing his successful constitutional challenge against the constitutionality of the IP Appellate Board. We also have articles from our experts on topics such as how India is adapting to delays in the legal system, issues arising from double patenting and the problem of forum shopping.

Our Australia Supplement features an interview with patent examiner Gillian Thompson giving us an inside look into IP Australia, as well as articles about the country's unique design patent system and another about the effect of capital gains tax regulations in Fiji on IP sales.

We hope you find these articles helpful and as usual welcome your feedback.

Below are the topics covered:

Asia-Pacific Focus

·        IP enforcement: the view from in-house counsel and judges

·        Australia: A year in the Australian IP courts

·        China: Functional features in patent infringement litigation

·        India: Government gears up for IP revamp

·        Indonesia: Challenges to royalty collection

·        Japan: An analysis of GUI protection in Japan

·        Malaysia: Monetising IP assets

·        The Philippines: Philippines leaves USTR Watch List

·        Taiwan: Principles of trade mark morality

India IP Focus

·        A crusade for transparency in IP

·        Time is of the essence

·        Public interest and imperfect recollection

·        Overcoming delays and inconsistency at the Indian Patent Office

·        Keeping an eye on forum shopping

·        Clarifying the blurry boundaries of multiple patents

·        A review of recent patent opposition cases

Australia Supplement

·        A day in the life of a patent examiner

·        Q&A: litigation update

·        A unique slant on a unique system

·        Innovation patents under scrutiny

·        A red flag for IP holders

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article