InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Beyond Pallante’s copyright testimony



James Nurton


With a few hours to spare in Washington DC last week, I decided to pop into room 2141 of the Rayburn House Office Building to hear the testimony of US Register of Copyrights Maria Pallante to the US House of Representatives’ Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet. It was enlightening

Maria PallanteAs has been well reported, Pallante (right) used the occasion to call for Congress to pass the " next great Copyright Act" (watch the video). Her comments have provoked critiques from the copyright industries, free speech advocates and even feminists.

In no particular order, here are my impressions of the hearing: fewer than half of the 26 members of the subcommittee were present for the testimony; those that were asked some pertinent questions, though they seemed to be specific to particular interests. By contrast, there were no spare seats for the public – I estimated there were about 150 people in the room and there was also an overflow area. The line to get in snaked around a corridor and those at the front must have arrived several hours before. There was a great variety of people there – in just a short period I chatted to two lawyers, a lobbyist, a photographer, someone from the Copyright Office and a person from a tech company. And I was completely unprepared for the extent to which the line for the hearing was a golden networking opportunity: some people walked up and down, chatting and swapping business cards, as though they were at a conference reception.

It’s clear a lot of people feel they have a stake in this debate. At a recent event on copyright reform in London, a senior judge noted that legislative change could best be effected by a "committee of experts" sitting around a table and coming up with proposals. Maybe, but who should be on that committee – copyright professors, lawyers and judges? the creative industries? technology companies such as Google? organisations such as the Open Rights Group and the Pirate Party? libraries? students? file-sharers? I suspect that until we agree on whose voice counts, it’s going to be impossible to make any meaningful reform.

Comments






profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

RT @mdloney: Michael Shore, the lawyer behind Allergan’s controversial transfer of patents to a Native American tribe, vowed to "take a wre…

Nov 22 2017 07:33 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Our weekly IP news round-up includes stories about Finjan, Blue Coat, Fox Television, design patents, Polaroid, Fuj… https://t.co/dOtK14m74v

Nov 22 2017 02:01 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Confidentiality clubs becoming more common in Indian patent disputes https://t.co/VcVqY6V4CY The Delhi High Court r… https://t.co/qkhIzENcAw

Nov 22 2017 10:00 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

IP-related blogs

1709 Copyright Blog

Afro-IP

AIA blog

Art and Artifice

China IPR

Class 99

Domain Incite

FOSS Patents

Green Patent Blog

Incontestable

IP CloseUp

IP Dragon

IP finance

IP Kat

IP Komodo

IP tango

IP Watchdog

IPEG

MARQUES Class 46

Orange Book Blog

Patent Baristas

PatentlyO

PatLit

SPC Blog

Spicy IP

The Trademark Blog

The TTABlog