Russia: Cultural heritage trade mark application rejected

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Russia: Cultural heritage trade mark application rejected

Ramon Confectionary, a famous entity in Russia, filed trade mark application number 2013705310 in respect of goods in class 30 (pictured below).

The figurative trade mark application carries an inscription for those who do not know: "Princess Oldenburg's Palace" and the words "Nobility Mansion" below the image.

The application was rejected, the reason being that the word element "Princess Oldenburg's Palace" and the figurative element of the claimed designation reproduces a fragment of the Oldenburg's Palace, a mansion of late nineteenth century in a small Ramon town in the vicinity of the city of Voronezh in central Russia. Indeed, this is a mirror image of the fragment of the photographic picture.

The mansion is an architectural monument and an object of cultural heritage of the Russian Federation listed under number 3600268000 so that registration of the claimed designation as a means of individualisation of the applicant's goods claimed in the trade mark application would contradict the public interest.

The applicant did not agree with the reasoning of the patent office. He argued that the picture of the ladies against the background of the mysterious mansion creates a most favourable impression on the viewer. It elicits thoughts of mystique, of some secret. He added that the artistic part of the claimed designation is represented by a fragment of a painting authored by Oksana Andreeva, a painter who drew the picture to order of the applicant. The contract with the painter had been submitted earlier by the applicant.

He also argued that the claimed designation is a realisation of the creative artistic idea and not an accurate photographic reproduction of the architectural object existing in reality. The picture is the result of intellectual efforts of the painter. He stressed the fact that the image of the towers in the background does not dominate in the designation and the attention of the viewer is concentrated on the two ladies shown in the forefront. Those two ladies sitting in the garden are the key elements in the claimed designation.

The figurative element in the claimed designation is semantically supported by the word element "Nobility Mansion". The image of the towers of the castle implies mystery and makes the consumer think where those ladies came from.

The board of the Chamber of Patent Disputes was not convinced by the applicant's arguments and pointed out that one of the conspicuous elements in the claimed designation is the figurative element which is a fragment of castle with towers. The word element "Princess Oldenburg's Palace" has little importance in the claimed designation. It occupies an insignificant place in the designation and can hardly be read by the consumer. Even though it attracts less attention considering the importance of the figurative elements it nevertheless emphasises the perception of the designation as a whole.

The palace of the Oldenburg family has the status of federal cultural heritage under number 3600268000.

The building complex of the Oldenburg family is a coherent monument of landscape and architecture; it is the only one in central Russia whose owners were akin to the Emperor's family.

The Chamber of Patent Disputes has every reason to believe that Oldenburg's Palace complex is a cultural heritage of the Russian people and is treasured as a special cultural value of the Russian Federation.

Article 36 of Federal law of 1996 "The Museums of the Russian Federation" provides that production of printed products, souvenirs and other large-scale products and consumer goods with the use of images of museum exhibits and museum collections, museum buildings, objects located on their territory as well as the use of their names and symbols shall be made on permission of the museum administration.

The documents on file do not contain such permission in the name of the applicant. Hence the registration of the trade mark was finally rejected.

It should be noted however that the above cultural inheritance is not known to each and every person in Russia. The applicant himself helped the examiner to reject his application by making an inscription on the claimed designation: "Princess Oldenburg's Palace." He directed the examiner where to look for a citation which the examiner easily did. The chances are the applicant would have easily obtained registration without that word element. This however would not have guaranteed his immunity against an interested person who would have been able to cancel the trade mark if it interfered with his business.

biriulin.jpg

Vladimir Biriulin



Gorodissky & Partners

Russia 129010, Moscow

B. Spasskaya Str

25, stroenie 3

Tel: +7 495 937 6116 / 6109

Fax: +7 495 937 6104 / 6123

pat@gorodissky.ru 

www.gorodissky.com 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Nigel Stoate, head of Taylor Wessing's award-winning UK patents team, tells us about his team’s UPC successes and why collaboration is king
Camilla Balleny, who spent a decade at Carpmaels & Ransford, will become the firm’s first head of patent litigation, Managing IP can reveal
Leaders at the newly merged firm Jones Maxwell Smith & Davis reveal their plan to take on bigger firms while attracting more clients and talent
Charles Achkar, who will bring a team of two with him, said he was excited about joining ‘one of the few strong IP boutiques’
Andy Lee, head of IP at Brandsmiths and winner of the Soft IP Practitioner of the Year award, tells us why 2024 was a seminal year and why clients value brave advice
The deal to acquire MIP's parent company is expected to complete by the end of May 2025
Jinwon Chun discusses the need for vigilance, his love for iced coffee, and preparing for INTA
Karl Barnfather’s new patent practice will focus on protecting and enforcing tech innovations in the electronics, AI, and software industries
Partner Ranjini Acharya explains how her Federal Circuit debut resulted in her convincing the court to rule that machine learning technology was not patent-eligible
Paul Hastings and Smart & Biggar also won multiple awards, while Baker McKenzie picked up a significant prize
Gift this article