Fathoming functionality for designs

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Fathoming functionality for designs

AIPPI_rio_designs_crop

Panellists were invited to “tame the beast” of functionality in a panel on industrial designs, which also served as an appetiser ahead of the Working Question on design functionality scheduled for debate at next year’s AIPPI Congress in Milan

AIPPI designs EU
AIPPI designs US
AIPPI designs BR
AIPPI designs China

Design law is one of the least harmonised areas of IP, not least in the terminology used, Chris Carani of McAndrews Held & Malloy said. One issue that continues to cause difficulty is the exception, common to most laws, that covers functional attributes. Speakers from the United States, China, Brazil and the EU discussed various cases where functionality had been addressed (see images).

These cases raise two policy questions regarding functionality, said Carani: first, what is the test to establish whether a design is eligible for protection? And, second, what is the scope of protection when particular elements of a design are dictated solely by function – should any aspects of the design be disregarded?

On the first, as Sara Ashby of Redd Solicitors in the UK illustrated, many tests have been proposed, including the multiplicity of forms theory, the alternative designs theory, the aesthetic consideration test and the primarily functional test. She discussed the Lindner v Franssons case, concerning industrial cutters, where the OHIM 3rd Board of Appeal said that a design is functional if its “characteristic features” pursue a purely technical function.

Carani said that in the US there has only been one case where the Federal Circuit has found that a design was solely dictated by function: it concerned a key blade where only the blade itself was claimed. In Brazil, said Lucas Gaiarsa of  Gaiarsa Ferreira & Meyer, the statutory exceptions are clear, but he added: “The law is there but the application is not always something you understand ­completely.”

On the second question (whether to disregard aspects of the design in infringement cases), Lila Wu of CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office said China’s courts had been clear that “any design feature with technical function should not be considered and should be removed from the comparison of infringement”. As an example, she cited a case involving an electrical power unit, where the plug holes were held to be functional. Ashby pointed to a European dispute involving a Dyson vacuum cleaner, where a transparent bin was held to be functional (it lets you see the dirt).

Cases such as these could be examples of where “claim construction ends up being claim destruction”, said Carani. The discussion demonstrated, he added, that there is no clarity on this topic: “Hopefully AIPPI can help.” The Working Question next year is expected to cover all the relevant policy issues and tests and it may even be necessary to ask the fundamental question “Do we need a functionality exception and what are we trying to prevent?” said Carani.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Bar Council of India’s warning to Dentons Link Legal and CMS IndusLaw shows why foreign firms are right to worry about India’s legal market
News of a trade secrets leak involving TSMC and an action in Japan against AI startup Perplexity were also among the top talking points
Rothwell Figg partner Leo Loughlin discusses the importance of pro bono work, and why ‘For the Kids’ should not be monopolised for trademark purposes
A new consultancy firm, set up by a former Warner Bros and Netflix lawyer, aims to resolve tensions between AI developers and the creative industries
Raúl Rubio, partner at Pérez-Llorca, outlines the firm’s AI initiatives and says solutions for law firms have yet to reach the required level of sophistication
MBIP principals Andy Mukherji and Ellen Reid discuss the firm’s combination with Jones Tulloch and reveal why younger firms stand to gain from AI demand
IP and commercial lawyers help ITV Studios acquire majority stake in Spanish production company Plano a Plano
The newly merged firm, formally announced on August 4, will have a combined revenue of around $3 billion and 40 IP partners
Managing IP will help mark IP Inclusive’s 10th anniversary by co-hosting a new podcast series covering diversity, equity, and inclusion within the IP profession
Tim Gilman, who joined Kasowitz alongside three other partners, says he is excited to be part of the firm’s ‘elite’ litigation team
Gift this article