InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Supreme Court rules on TTAB preclusion


The US Supreme Court last month held that TTAB litigants are not entitled to a second bite at the apple in subsequent Federal Court infringement litigation – unless it is a materially different apple. David Donahue and Jason Jones explain

The US Supreme Court recently held in B&B Hardware, Inc v Hargis Industries, Inc, Dkt No 13-352 (March 24 2015), that a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the US Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) on the...


Please log in to read the rest of this article.

New to Managing Intellectual Property? Take advantage of free access to up to 5 articles on Managing IP and become a member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.

Already registered?

Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.

Log in

Join us now

Gain FREE access to up to five free articles when you register now.

Join here

profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

@schestowitz Well, we do what we think is most appropriate & useful for our readers. Can't speak for others.

Apr 28 2017 04:43 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

@schestowitz It's true that we have sought interviews with AMBA (not specifically on UPC) and permission was refused by the EPO president.

Apr 28 2017 04:41 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

@schestowitz However, we have also given space to voices critical of UPC & Unitary Patent, eg in Spain & Poland https://t.co/QXiPQknzDg

Apr 28 2017 04:38 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


April 2017

Patent subject matter eligibility: A new Section 101

Calls for changing Section 101 of the Patent Act in the US are increasing. A proposed amendment from IPO shows one way to do it, reports Michael Loney



Most read articles

Supplements