KIPO looks to reduce examiner workload

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

KIPO looks to reduce examiner workload

kiki-and-popo-small.jpg

KIPO’s 2014 statistics show both a modest increase in patent and trade mark applications as well as reductions in pendency times

KIPO mascots

KIPO mascots Kiki and Popo. Kiki and Popo are "are human robots that symbolise cutting-edge science and technology illustrating KIPO as the highest intellectual property rights organisation in Korea"

KIPO received 210,000 applications in 2014, a 2.8% increase from the previous year. The office also received 150,000 trade mark applications, compared to 147,667 in 2013. In addition, it received 64,000 design applications, a 3.9% drop from 2013.

Overall, KIPO received 434,000 applications including invention patents, trade marks, designs, and utility models, a 0.9% increase from 2013.

For patent applications, average pendency time was 11 months in 2014, an improvement over the 13-month average pendency period in 2013. According to KIPO’s statistics, the pendency times for patent, trade mark and design applications as well as for trials before the IP Tribunal have been steadily dropping since 2010, with patent applications making the biggest gains. In 2010, the average pendency time for a patent application was over 18 months.

KIPO says its goal is to reduce average patent application pendency times to 10 months in 2015. It also aims to lower average pendency times for trade mark and design applications to five months from the 2014 average of slightly over six months for both.

In addition to reducing pendency times, KIPO says that it has been seeking to reduce the average workload per patent examiner. In 2014, the average KIPO examiner examined 207 patents, a number that is higher than those at the USPTO and EPO. Similarly, the average JPO examiner examined 193 applications per year in 2013.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Firms explain the IP concerns that can arise amid attempts by brands to show off their ‘Canadianness’ to consumers
Counsel say they will be monitoring issues such as the placement of house marks, and how Mondelēz demonstrates a likelihood of confusion in its dispute with Aldi
The EUIPO expanding its mediation services and a new Riyadh office for Simmons & Simmons were also among the top talking points this week
David Boundy explains why Pierson Ferdinand provides a platform that will allow him to use administrative law to address IP concerns
Developments included an anti-anti-suit injunction being granted for the first time, and the court clarifying that it can adjudicate over alleged infringements that occurred before June 2023
Griffith Hack’s Amanda Stark, one of our ‘Top 250 Women in IP’, explains how peer support from male colleagues is crucial, and reveals why the life sciences sector is thriving
The case, which could offer clarity on the training of AI models within the context of copyright law, will go to trial in the UK next week
CMS IndusLaw co-founder Suneeth Katarki says he plans to hire a patent team in India and argues that IP should play a major role within full-service firms
Partners at the firm explain why they’ve seen more SEP cases at the ITC, and why they are comfortable recommending the forum to clients
The association, which will head to London in 2026, hosted its flagship event in the Californian city in 2005, 2015 and 2025
Gift this article