The number one issue for IP owners

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The number one issue for IP owners

What is the biggest challenge for IP owners entering emerging markets? This was one of the questions addressed by the UK’s IP attachés, who were visiting London recently from their bases in Brazil, China, Singapore and Switzerland

IPAN panel

Their two roles are to provide practical support to UK companies, particularly SMEs, entering new markets, and to work with host nation governments on improvements to laws and enforcement. France and the United States have similar networks of representatives.

Speaking at an event hosted by IPAN at CIPA last month (right), the UK attachés noted that they have worked with 233 individual companies, who have IP rights estimated at £377 million ($600 million).

They also spoke about some of the specific issues they have been working on. So what, I wondered is the single biggest challenge for UK rights owners in these markets? Is it counterfeiting? Copyright piracy? Problems with patentability? Cybersquatting? Compulsory licensing? The expense and time of litigation? The difficulty of finding local lawyers?

It turns out it’s more mundane. About 40% of the issues the attaches work on concern trade marks. And based on their presentations and from speaking to them afterwards, it seems like the single biggest headache is bad faith applications. As the UK attaché in Beijing Tom Duke said, one of the main unanswered questions about the revisions to China’s Trade Mark Law is: “How will they deal with the systemic problem of bad faith applications?”

Wait Rose Chennai

Some of these experiences might be unique to British institutions – both Buckingham Palace and the Royal Mint have had to take action in India – but others are typical for owners of well-known brands. One example given (also from India) was the Wait Rose supermarket set up in Chennai - the two words separated by a picture of a rose (see photo).

In some ways it seems ridiculous that more than 130 years after the Paris Convention was signed, and despite the popularity of systems such as the Madrid Protocol, trade mark owners are bedevilled by chancers exploiting their hard-earned goodwill to confuse consumers.

On the other hand, perhaps it’s an unavoidable effect of the flattening of the world. Some people might also say trade mark owners only have themselves to blame if they don’t take steps to register their rights promptly.

We’d be interested to know what readers think. Are bad faith applications a nuisance, or something worse? And can anything realistically be done to tackle them?

For more information on the UK IP attachés, read the independent report on their work so far.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article