Interview: Clemens Heusch of Nokia on judges at the UPC

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Interview: Clemens Heusch of Nokia on judges at the UPC

The most important issue for the planned Unified Patent Court is the quality of the judges, Clemens Heusch of Nokia told Managing IP in a recent interview

Speaking during the Patent Reform Forum held in Munich on September 9, Heusch, head of European litigation at the telecoms company, said: “The most decisive thing is that we get good judges, because the procedure is only helpful if we get good quality judgments. If they are overturned on appeal, they are not helpful in the end.”

He added that while there are still concerns about issues such as procedural rules, IT and logistics, “with good judges we will get this running”.

Several hundred legal and technical judges have been identified already, but Heusch said it is vital to ensure the best ones are chosen: “I’m a little bit concerned that we have too many political factors to take into account, like nationality. I don’t care whether the judge is from England, France, Germany or Portugal as long as he or she is good.”

He also said he expects the Unitary Patent and UPC to be widely used after a warm-up phase, noting that it offers attractions such as pan-European injunctions to patentees.

Watch the full interview here:


See all the interviews from Munich on Managing IP's YouTube channel. Note that all speakers are talking in a personal capacity, and their views are not necessarily those of their employers or clients.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article