New Zealand’s new patent law comes into effect

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand’s new patent law comes into effect

New Zealand’s new patent law gets rid of some outdated provisions, expand third party actions and addresses software patent issues

The new Patent Law, which passed last year and came into effect on Friday, replaced a law that was over 60 years old.

Given the age of the previous law, it is not surprising that the new law addresses several unique quirks. For example, New Zealand examiners previously examined applications for novelty but not obviousness, though third parties could challenge a patent on obviousness grounds. Under the new law, patent applications will be examined for obviousness.

Similarly, under the new law, New Zealand also finally has a worldwide novelty requirement. Under the old law, novelty was only examined as to whether the invention was disclosed in New Zealand.

The law also looks to make it easier for third parties to challenge patents both pre- and post-grant. Furthermore, patent applications will automatically be published 18 months after the earliest priority date, making it easier for third parties to submit relevant prior art.

The new law also excludes from patentability computer programs “as such”, though it is expected that the presence of a technical effect will allow inventions to get around this “as such” exclusion.

For more on the new law, see our previous coverage.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Arrival of Laura Alonso, alongside a team of 11, will bring ‘significant value’ to ECIJA clients, says CEO
In the first of a two-part article, lawyers at Spruson & Ferguson and Marshall Gerstein provide an overview of China’s system for appealing against patent invalidation decisions
Lawyers and corporate leaders at INTA’s Business of M&A conference in New York discussed how cross-practice collaboration and early in-house involvement can help deals
Lily Li, partner at Morrison Foerster, shares how her litigation team helped secure victory at the ITC in a patent infringement case
Top talking points also included news of an appellate ruling concerning ‘Pisco’ and Indian drugmakers gearing up to launch generic versions of Ozempic as Novo Nordisk’s patent expires
Gift this article