Advocate General backs libraries’ right to digitise
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Advocate General backs libraries’ right to digitise

Advocate General Niilo Jääskinen, of the Court of Justice of the EU, argues that a member state may authorise libraries to digitise books without the consent of copyright holders

He gave his opinion today in a case concerning the EU Copyright Directive referred from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof. The dispute is between the Technische Universität Darmstadt and publisher Eugen Ulmer.

Eugen Ulmer sought to prevent the university from digitising a book in its library collection and to prevent users from being able to print the book or save it on a USB stick via electronic reading points.

In the opinion, the Advocate General says that member states may grant libraries the right to digitise books in their collections, if their being made available to the public by dedicated terminals requires it. This may be the case where works are old, fragile or rare or where they could be damaged by photocopying.

But he adds that this only applies to the digitisation of individual works, not a collection in its entirety.

Additionally, he says that the Copyright Directive does not allow users of terminals to save the works on a USB stick (as that would be the creation of a private digital copy). But the printing of a work from a terminal is comparable to making a photocopy, and may be covered by the private copying exception.

The opinion is not yet published in English, but is available in most other European languages. A press statement from the Court summarises it.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Loes van den Winkel, attorney at Arnold & Siedsma, explains why clients' enthusiasm is contagious and why her job does not mean managing fashion models
Allen & Gledhill partner Jia Yi Toh shares her experience of representing the winning team in the first-ever case filed under Singapore’s new fast-track IP dispute resolution system
In-house lawyers reveal how they balance cost, quality, and other criteria to get the most from their relationships with external counsel
Dario Pietrantonio of Robic discusses growth opportunities for the firm and shares insights from his journey to managing director
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Practitioners analyse a survey on how law firms prove value to their clients and reflect on why the concept can be hard to pin down
Gift this article