Advocate General backs libraries’ right to digitise

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Advocate General backs libraries’ right to digitise

Advocate General Niilo Jääskinen, of the Court of Justice of the EU, argues that a member state may authorise libraries to digitise books without the consent of copyright holders

He gave his opinion today in a case concerning the EU Copyright Directive referred from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof. The dispute is between the Technische Universität Darmstadt and publisher Eugen Ulmer.

Eugen Ulmer sought to prevent the university from digitising a book in its library collection and to prevent users from being able to print the book or save it on a USB stick via electronic reading points.

In the opinion, the Advocate General says that member states may grant libraries the right to digitise books in their collections, if their being made available to the public by dedicated terminals requires it. This may be the case where works are old, fragile or rare or where they could be damaged by photocopying.

But he adds that this only applies to the digitisation of individual works, not a collection in its entirety.

Additionally, he says that the Copyright Directive does not allow users of terminals to save the works on a USB stick (as that would be the creation of a private digital copy). But the printing of a work from a terminal is comparable to making a photocopy, and may be covered by the private copying exception.

The opinion is not yet published in English, but is available in most other European languages. A press statement from the Court summarises it.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
The court ruled against the owner of the ‘Umbro’ mark, despite noting that post-sale confusion can be a legitimate ground for infringement
Shem Otanga discusses the importance of curiosity and passion, and why he would have loved to have been a professional recording artist
Gift this article