Looking for the wow factor in designs

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Looking for the wow factor in designs

“Good morning trademark people,” began Grégoire Bisson, Director of The Hague Registry, at the Madrid System Users’ Meeting yesterday. “There’s nothing wrong with trademarks, but once you’ve worked in designs there is no going back.”

The WIPO official explained his enthusiasm for the world of design law by outlining how important design has become to IP over the past 50 years. “We used to buy watches by looking for the most reliable watch for our budget,” he said. “Trademarks offered some promise of that reliability. Now though, reliability is assumed and what people look for is design. People want products that have the ‘wow’ factor.”

Design registrations have grown at twice the speed of trademark registrations over the past nine years, Bisson said. Most design owners, however, seek protection in their home country. That’s because there is territoriality of rights, making the application process cumbersome and expensive. The good news for design owners is that the Hague System, administered by WIPO, can make the application process more efficient. The bad news is that it has limited geographical scope, compared with the scope of protection offered to trademarks through the Madrid System.

“But stay tuned,” said Bisson. “The Hague System will grow massively.” South Korea is due to join in July, the United States in October, and Japan, China, the 10 Asean countries and Russia could join in 2015. Canada, Mexico and ARIPO are also considering whether to accede to the Hague Agreement.

Expansion of the System, however, could lead to what Bisson described as “complexification.” One solution is for WIPO member states to agree on a draft Design Law Treaty, designed to simplify registration formalities for industrial designs. At WIPO’s Extraordinary General Assembly last week, member states discussed convening a diplomatic conference on the Treaty. Even if that does not mature into domestic legislation for many years, said Bisson, it will act as a best practice model for IP offices around the world.

Yesterday’s Madrid System Users Meeting also featured presentations from representatives of trademark offices in Tunisia, Mexico, India, OAPI and Hong Kong, while WIPO officials provided an update on changes to the system, and how trademark owners can make better use of it. For more details, see page 5.

To find out more about designs, attend today's session IM20 The Shape of Things to Come: Clearing and Protecting High-Tech Product Configurations​ from 11:45 am to 1:00 pm in Convention Hall A.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article