The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on April 28 about whether a Federal Circuit decision that allows patents with multiple reasonable interpretations dilutes the statutory requirement for particular and distinct claims, with some observers predicting the Court will ask the Federal Circuit to come up with a new rule
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted