The people from the IPO want to help you

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The people from the IPO want to help you

Ronald Reagan famously quipped that the nine most terrifying words in the English language are “I’m from the government, and I’m here to help”. But a call from the UK IPO may not be quite so scary

At the launch of its 2014-15 research priorities last week, the IPO’s directors emphasised what

wallace-and-gromit.jpg
they are doing, in the words of Chief Executive John Alty, to “help promote innovation in the UK”.

This is partly of course about efficiently handling applications and renewals, and discussing matters of policy with other countries. But increasingly it is also about talking to businesses and consumers about IP creation and use.

Indeed, two of the ministerial targets set for the IPO in 2014-15 are:

  • Reach an audience of 5 million people with messages to build respect for IP by end of March 2015

  • Reach an audience of 10,000 businesses through the IP for Business online tool by end of March 2015

In the coming year, the Office is also working to deliver an Enforcement Summit, to promote web tools for students and to develop its IP Equip advice tool. Among other initiatives it has recruited the cartoon characters Wallace and Gromit (right) to educate children, launched the IP Connect newsletter and supported the Karaoke Shower (apparently, there is a video of Alty performing – luckily I couldn’t find it online).

For Rosa Wilkinson (below), the Office’s enthusiastic innovation director, this is not enough, though. Speaking last week, she said there is “lots more to do to wake businesses up to manage their IP”; stressed that there was room to “improve understanding for businesses and the financial services community” and added for good measure: “Too many accountants know very little about IP.”

Rosa Wilkinson

Despite Reagan’s gag (which you can see on YouTube), I expect most IP practitioners will welcome these kinds of government initiatives (though the UK IPO is strictly speaking an “Executive Agency” rather than the government itself). I know that more and more national offices all over the world are looking at how they can promote IP education and training, and play a role in enforcement and deterrence.

On the other hand, there may be owners of patents, trade marks and other rights who don’t appreciate government intervention, and object to money (which ultimately comes from users’ fees) being spent in this way.

Which camp are you in? Please send us your comments.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article