Countries fail to reach a compromise in TPP talks

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Countries fail to reach a compromise in TPP talks

After four days of negotiations, international delegates from 12 countries have failed to reach a compromise over the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement.

The Office of the United States Trade Representative issued a statement yesterday claiming that "substantial progress" has been made in the TPP talks, which are now expected to continue into next year.

The news follows Monday's release by whistleblowing site WikiLeaks of two documents that suggest the US is isolated in its positions on many issues including intellectual property, and is exerting "great pressure" on other countries to comply with its demands.

One of the documents, an internal memo, records "large differences that continue in most areas of the chapter" on intellectual property. It recounts the meeting chair recording solutions "coming from the US position", prompting other countries to demand corrections to the text, which could later be used by the US as a basis for reaching an agreement.

The memo also describes the US proposals on Investor State Dispute Settlement, which allow companies to directly sue governments at a secret international arbitration tribunal, as one of "one of the most significant barriers to closing the chapter" on investment.

The other document, a spreadsheet outlining the positions of the countries on the various issues, shows the US as the sole supporter of proposals such as linkage requirements for pharmaceuticals, the criminalisation of copyright infringement and rules against parallel importation, which was judged to be legal by its own Supreme Court in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley.

The countries involved in the TPP negotiations are Australia, New Zealand, the US, Peru, Chile, Mexico, Canada, Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia, Japan and Vietnam.

Yesterday, six members of US Congress wrote to President Barack Obama arguing that the "secret" negotiations benefit pharmaceutical companies at the expense of public health. The writers, all Democrats, urged the president not to make any final trade agreements "that affect critical health issues" until politicians and members of the public have had the opportunity to review and comment on the proposals.

Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel prize-winning economist from the Columbia University School of Business, has also written to the negotiators, arguing that several of the proposals would weaken the 2001 Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health.

Separately, 27 organisations and over 70 individuals have signed on to a letter by Knowledge Ecology International protesting the proposal to extend copyright protection to life plus 70 years. The letter argues the extension will result in the loss of countless owned but uncommercialised works and will be "costly to consumers and performers, while benefiting persons and corporate owners that had nothing to do with the creation of the work."

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deborah Kirk discusses why IP and technology have become central pillars in transactions and explains why clients need practically minded lawyers
IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals its latest rankings for patent work, including which firms are moving up
Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
Gift this article