US government pays $50 million settlement for pirated software
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US government pays $50 million settlement for pirated software

The US government has agreed to pay $50 million to settle a copyright infringement suit after the Army allegedly installed software on thousands of unlicensed computers.

Apptricity, an 80-employee company that supplies the Army with logistics software, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit with the US Court of Federal Claims seeking $250 million from the government.

In 2004, the Army paid for licenses for Apptricity software for three servers at $1.35 million each, along with licenses for individual computers. In 2007 the Army purchased licenses for another two servers and thousands of workstations, along with annual maintenance.

But Apptricity claims that the Army also installed approximately 100 server and 9,000 device licenses that it did not procure. The situation came to Apptricity’s attention when the US Army Program Director publicly stated in 2009 that thousands of devices had Apptricity software.

The software tracks the movement of goods, equipment and troops in real time across multiple time zones. The Army has used it in the Middle East and to handle emergency management efforts such as the aftermath of the January 2010 earthquake in Haiti.

“Field commanders were focused on the mission-critical nature of Apptricity software and the need to protect warfighters and facilitate mission objectives,” said Apptricity CEO Tim Garcia. “Our battle-tested integrated logistics software performed so well that it went viral.”

After mediation, the parties agreed a settlement of $50 million for the present and future use of the software.

The US government is a frequent proponent of tough penalties for violators of IP rights and has run initiatives including the Joint Strategic Plan aimed at curtailing copyright infringement.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Justin Davidson and Stanley Ng of Norton Rose Fulbright discuss what China’s recent Ultraman ruling does and doesn’t say about who is responsible when an AI system infringes copyright
Former in-house counsel reveal how consultancy work helped them win new business and how they cut through the stigma surrounding the job title
In-house counsel discuss the law firm billing practices that will win them over and the ones that drive them away
If the deal goes through, one group will manage more than 50% of patent filings in Australia and employ more than a quarter of patent attorneys in Australia and New Zealand
Siegmund Gutman, former chair of the life sciences patent group at Proskauer, is among a group of 10 lawyers to join Mintz Levin
A patent dispute between two manufacturing companies has shown that teething problems with the UPC’s case management system have not abated
Lawyers weigh in on the USPTO’s request for comment on the effects of AI on prior art analysis and obviousness determinations
A vast majority of corporates – especially smaller businesses – rely on a trusted referral when instructing external counsel, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Munich Regional Court ruled that Lenovo was an unwilling licensee and had engaged in ‘holdout’ tactics
Gift this article