China’s well-known mark scam revealed

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China’s well-known mark scam revealed

If you haven’t heard of some of the brands on China’s list of well-known trade marks, you aren’t alone. Many Chinese haven’t heard of all of them either. A scandal in Henan province that has seen nine lawyers and judges arrested this year in connection with a well-known mark scam might explain why

Caixin reports that the nine are being investigated over allegations that they worked together to ensure that certain trade marks were given well-known status.

Having a well-known mark offers prestige to a brand as well as giving its owners greater powers to block competing marks from the registry. It can be obtained in one of two ways in China: through administrative proceedings such as a trade mark opposition or cancellation action, and through litigation.

The Henan arrests have shone a light on scams in China that lawyers say see company executives pay an individual to infringe their mark. The company files a lawsuit against the willing defendant and in the course of the litigation a friendly judge agrees to declare the plaintiff’s mark well known.

They also come after China’s highest court, the Supreme People’s Court, issued a series of opinions explaining how judges should interpret and apply the country’s IP laws.

Lawyers from Hogan Lovells say that the Opinions from the Supreme People's Court of China on Giving Full Play to the Functional Role of Intellectual Property Trials explain that the courts should carefully examine evidence submitted in support of a claim for well-known status to prevent companies from deliberately creating trademark disputes as a means to seek the recognition of well-known trade mark, suggesting that China’s top judges are aware of scams similar to those alleged to have taken place in Henan.

Deanna Wong of Hogan Lovells told Managing IP that she believes the wide-ranging opinions have led to more reasonable, consistent rulings from Chinese courts.

But she added that while many brand owners focus on obtaining well-known status for their trade marks, there is still uncertainty over the exact level of additional protection it offers.

“Historically it was believed that registered well-known marks would be offered more protection in other classes. But does it also mean that owners of well-known marks will find it easier to enforce their marks?” said Wong. “It may not be as good a weapon as it should be.”

Have you had your mark declared well known in China? If so, share your experiences by clicking on the comment button above.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Jinwon Chun discusses the need for vigilance, his love for iced coffee, and preparing for INTA
Karl Barnfather’s new patent practice will focus on protecting and enforcing tech innovations in the electronics, AI, and software industries
Partner Ranjini Acharya explains how her Federal Circuit debut resulted in her convincing the court to rule that machine learning technology was not patent-eligible
Paul Hastings and Smart & Biggar also won multiple awards, while Baker McKenzie picked up a significant prize
Burford Capital study finds that in-house lawyers have become more likely to monetise patents, but that their IP portfolios are still underutilised
Robert Reading and Faidon Zisis at Clarivate unpick some of the data surrounding music-related trademarks
China's latest IP litigation statistics and a high-profile hire by O'Melveny were also among the top talking points this week
David Aylen, who spent more than 20 years at Gowling WLG, has joined United Trademark and Patent Services as of counsel in the UAE
Europe is among the most lucrative legal markets for PE firms to bet on, but clients’ reactions will decide whether external investment drives success
Rulings of note covered pre-June 2023 infringements and jurisdiction over non-UPC states, while winners of Managing IP’s EMEA Awards acted in multiple cases
Gift this article