The 50 most influential people in IP




For the past 10 years Managing IP has listed what it considers to be the most influential people in the world of intellectual property. This year we have ranked the top 10 in order for the first time.

This adds an extra dimension to the list, comparing the different roles of companies, politicians and IP offices, and we hope it will stimulate some debate.

If you want to take part in that discussion, please comment on the stories online or join us on LinkedIn or Twitter (#MIP50)


  • 1

    Larry Page may not have guessed he would become a pivotal figure for IP, but as four high-profile cases pan out against Google across patents, trade marks and copyright, that’s exactly what he and his company have become
  • 2

    When representatives of WIPO member states met in Beijing last month and signed a treaty, it was the first significant international IP agreement in 15 years.
  • 3

    With the 2012 US presidential election imminent, David Kappos may be nearing the end of his reign – but for now he is leading the US into a new era of patent law
  • 4

    IP rights in China have developed at a breakneck pace under Tian Lipu’s stewardship; what else does he have in store for the world’s second largest market?
  • 5

    Kerstin Jorna has to steer Europe’s unitary patent package through some particularly choppy political waters. If she can do it, proponents say patent applicants can expect to save thousands of dollars
  • 6

    The chairman of Germany’s Pirate Party believes in liquid democracy but not copyright. Now his biggest test is to build on the Party's early electoral success
  • 7

    The chief judge of the US patent court says the economy depends on patents
  • 8

    Nicola Roxon took on Big Tobacco with a law in Australia that prioritises public health over trade mark rights. IP owners will wait to see which countries – and which products – could be next
  • 9

    Already known as Japan’s IP maverick, Toshiaki Iimura is now in a position to fundamentally change the country’s IP landscape
  • 10

    An unlikely candidate for the Top 50, Christian Louboutin has become embroiled in a trade mark fight that could change the way colour marks are protected and clarify aesthetic functionality
The rest of the Top 50
              

What do you think of the Top 10? Have your say by using the comment function at the top of the page, or join us on LinkedIn or Twitter (#MIP50)




Article Comments

It's a mistake to think of any person -- or issue -- as being "in IP",
because "intellectual property" is a misleading generalization. It
lumps together laws that, at the practical level, have nothing in
common. They have totally different requirements and totally
different effects. Even if we consider just copyright and patent, two
laws out of a dozen or so, all they have in common is one sentence in
the US constitution (supposing you're in the US).

The habit of grouping these laws together is an impediment to thinking
clearly about any of them, and encourages foolish sweeping views
such as being "for IP" or "against IP".

See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html.

Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org

Richard M Stallman Jul 20, 2012

Thanks for your comment and your valid points Mike. It seems though that the tobacco companies (and some brand owners associations), at least, see the Australian proposals as an attack on their TM rights. But it looks like it will be for the courts to decide now.

It's a good point about Richard Posner - his recent comments about patent trolls came a little bit too late to warrant his inclusion this year. Maybe he'll be there in 2013 if he maintains his high profile?

James Nurton Jul 19, 2012

I was intrigued to see two Australian's in the list. I think that you have misrepresented the position of Nicola Roxon on trade marks though. The relevant legislation, which is supported by both major political parties, mandates plain packaging on cigarette cartons, including the use of plain font brand names. Tobacco companies retain the full ownership of their trade marks.

This issue has been characterised by some critics as an attack on trade mark rights. I do not understand this. Nowhere in IP law, in any field, is a right to own an IP right a right to use said right. Instead ownership of an IP right is the right to sue other people who infringe these rights. This right is not changed by this legislation.

In other words, Nicola Roxon does not deserve her top 10 place in the world of IP. Maybe she might deserve a top 10 spot in an anti-smoking list, but this is an IP list.

Maybe Judge Posner instead? Or the Supreme Court of the US?

Mike Lloyd Jul 18, 2012

View all comments
More from the Managing IP blog


Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the the 135th INTA Annual Meeting in Dallas


 

 

 

 


May 2013

Look behind the salaries

A survey of the largest IP practices in the US reveals rising compensation, but only at general-practice firms. And partners are having a hard time everywhere. Alli Pyrah explains who is hiring and what lawyers they need



Most read articles

Poll

Following the US Apple v Samsung trial, do you think juries should play a role in patent cases?







Supplements