Australian academics round on ACTA

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australian academics round on ACTA

A group of Australian academics has told a key parliamentary committee why they believe Australia should reconsider ratifying the controversial anti-counterfeiting treaty ACTA.

Law academics Kimberlee Weatherall of the University of Sydney and Matthew Rimmer from the Australian National University, and Hazel Moir of the Australian National University’s Centre for Policy Innovation spoke today at a public hearing into ACTA organised by the Federal Parliament’s Treaties Committee.

Rimmer told the hearing that he believed ACTA fails to provide safeguards in respect of human rights, consumer protection, competition, and privacy laws while Weatherall criticised the way the deal was negotiated and said that rights given to IP owners under ACTA had not been balanced by user rights of access.

Committee chair, Kelvin Thomson MP, said it was holding a second public hearing so the committee can gather as much information and perspectives as possible, given that ACTA has inspired such a level of protest.

“The committee understands that this is a controversial treaty nationally and internationally and is interested in hearing all points of view”, he said.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article