IPHONE mark held inherently non-distinctive


Apple Inc applied to the Swiss Trade Mark Office to register the word mark IPHONE for broadly worded goods in classes 9 and 28, the specified class 9 goods being essentially telephones and functionally related products. The Office rejected the application for the class 9 goods on the grounds that the mark IPHONE will be immediately understood by consumers as describing a telephone with internet- or information technology-related functions, and accordingly represents a non-distinctive, descriptive indication.

Apple appealed the decision to the Federal...


Please log in to read the rest of this article.

New to Managing Intellectual Property? Take advantage of one week’s FREE access and become a Managing IP member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.

Already registered?

Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.

Log in

Join us now

Gain 7 days FREE access when you register now.

Join here

profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

China's National People's Congress announces establishment of IP courts in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou http://t.co/eXcF0ggvSe

Sep 1 2014 04:27 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Kilpatrick partner named US intellectual property enforcement coordinator http://t.co/je6KU98rjT http://t.co/VdQL4Rm9Vp

Aug 29 2014 03:53 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

@Copyright101 @TheCSUSA Would seem to be much easier for Pres. Obama to appoint an IPEC #iptsar than a USPTO Director. Wonder why ...

Aug 29 2014 03:13 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


July/August 2014

IP’s most influential people 2014

The 50 people in social media, advocacy and debate influencing IP policy



Most read articles

Supplements