IPHONE mark held inherently non-distinctive


Apple Inc applied to the Swiss Trade Mark Office to register the word mark IPHONE for broadly worded goods in classes 9 and 28, the specified class 9 goods being essentially telephones and functionally related products. The Office rejected the application for the class 9 goods on the grounds that the mark IPHONE will be immediately understood by consumers as describing a telephone with internet- or information technology-related functions, and accordingly represents a non-distinctive, descriptive indication.

Apple appealed the decision to the Federal...


Please log in to read the rest of this article.

New to Managing Intellectual Property? Take advantage of one week’s FREE access and become a Managing IP member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.

Already registered?

Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.

Log in

Join us now

Gain 7 days FREE access when you register now.

Join here

profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

China: New measures to address online counterfeiting #trademark (sponsored) http://t.co/z6uJlaf2el

Jul 30 2014 06:30 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

"Podcast patent" holder says it has dropped suit against @adamcarolla, but Carolla's invalidation action continues. http://t.co/44S2UIssqT

Jul 30 2014 02:43 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Vietnam: Landmark win in Lafarge domain name dispute (sponsored) http://t.co/OXrx8gbN9j

Jul 30 2014 01:35 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the INTA Annual Meeting in Hong Kong



July/August 2014

IP’s most influential people 2014

The 50 people in social media, advocacy and debate influencing IP policy



Most read articles

Supplements