IPHONE mark held inherently non-distinctive


Apple Inc applied to the Swiss Trade Mark Office to register the word mark IPHONE for broadly worded goods in classes 9 and 28, the specified class 9 goods being essentially telephones and functionally related products. The Office rejected the application for the class 9 goods on the grounds that the mark IPHONE will be immediately understood by consumers as describing a telephone with internet- or information technology-related functions, and accordingly represents a non-distinctive, descriptive indication.

Apple appealed the decision to the Federal...


Please log in to read the rest of this article.

New to Managing Intellectual Property? Take advantage of one week’s FREE access and become a Managing IP member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.

Already registered?

Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.

Log in

Join us now

Gain 7 days FREE access when you register now.

Join here

profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

Slightly truncated today, but here's our weekly round up of IP news & developments feat. UK, Ireland & Singapore http://t.co/BNmL43gxoN

Aug 22 2014 05:00 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Re #AppSung settlement, what we really want to know is: what are all the patent lawyers working on the case going to do now?

Aug 22 2014 04:07 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Friday reading: @FOSSpatents on the #appsung patent settlement & lessons learned http://t.co/MDPnq7rxV4 #mipblog http://t.co/N3dJgX5i2M

Aug 22 2014 03:39 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


July/August 2014

IP’s most influential people 2014

The 50 people in social media, advocacy and debate influencing IP policy



Most read articles

Supplements