Managing Intellectual Property

Meet the people shaping the future of IP

01 July 2009

Managing IP publishes its seventh annual list of the 50 most influential people in IP

Are politicians able to take the initiative on reforming the IP system? Many IP owners may be starting to doubt that they can. Over the past year, rights owners around the world have seen a series of legislative attempts to reform IP practice stall: the European Commission has not yet persuaded member states to introduce a Community patent and a unified patent litigation system; Congress has failed to agree, as yet, on a law to overhaul the US patent regime; and in countries from New Zealand to France government attempts to make internet service providers take more responsibility for monitoring the accounts of persistent downloaders have been stymied by the courts or fears of a public opinion backlash.

With politicians increasingly unable to provide all of the answers to IP issues affecting the day-to-day lives of consumers and business people – from accessing music online to applying for and defending...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements