-
Sponsored by InventaVítor Sérgio Moreira talks about accelerate the examination before the European Patent Office
-
Sponsored by Moroğlu ArsevenMoroğlu Arseven talk about IP-focused due diligence process
-
Sponsored by Moroğlu ArsevenMoroğlu Arseven talk about the long-awaited regulation on non-use cancellation actions of the trademarks published
-
Sponsored by Becerril, Coca & BecerrilArantxa Monroy of Becerril, Coca & Becerril says trademarks do not merely assert a legal right; they underpin reputation, attract investment, and create long-term enterprise value when managed strategically
-
Sponsored by HANOL ClassHankyul IP & LawMin Son of Hanol IP & Law explains an Intellectual Property High Court decision addressing the applicability of the abuse of right doctrine in a design invalidation action
-
Sponsored by Moroğlu ArsevenMoroğlu Arseven talk about the uncertain future of the Turkish patent and trademark office's
-
Sponsored by Moroğlu ArsevenMoroğlu Arseven talks about how far unified patent court can extend its reach?
-
Sponsored by Tilleke & GibbinsLoc Xuan Le, Giang Hoang Bach, and Duc Anh Tran of T&G Law Firm LLC (TGVN), the local associate firm of Tilleke & Gibbins, report on a rare challenge to a non-use cancellation
-
Sponsored by Bird & BirdMarta Koremba, Mateusz Żuk, and Michał Liszka of Bird & Bird report on a notable judgment concerning an infringement of the Prosecco geographical indication in the cosmetics sector
-
Sponsored by Saint Island International Patent & Law OfficesSumin Lai of Saint Island International Patent & Law Offices outlines how the decisions offer valuable insights into inventive step assessment in Taiwanese patent disputes
-
Sponsored by MaiwaldKerstin Wolff and Tobias Matschke of Maiwald Intellectual Property examine a landmark Unified Patent Court decision on second medical use claims and compare it with Germany’s established approach to ‘skinny label’ products
-
Sponsored by Spoor & FisherHerman Blignaut of Spoor & Fisher South Africa addresses whether the act extends to intellectual property rights and reassures brand owners that constitutional protection remains intact