Long-awaited regulation on non-use cancellation actions of the trademarks published

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Long-awaited regulation on non-use cancellation actions of the trademarks published

Sponsored by

MorogluArseven_Turkey2.png

Moroğlu Arseven talk about the long-awaited regulation on non-use cancellation actions of the trademarks published

The long-anticipated amendments to the Regulation on the Implementation of the Industrial Property Law (“the Regulation”), addressing non-use cancelation action proceedings, were published in the Official Gazette on March 15, 2025, and numbered 32842 and have entered into force. These amendments provide much-needed clarity on non-use cancellation actions, a crucial tool for clearing unused trademarks from the registry.

Background

The Industrial Property Law No. 6769 (“the Law”), enacted in 2017, transferred the authority for non-use cancelation from the courts to the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (“TPTO”) as of January 10, 2024. This reform was widely welcomed by the IP community as it aimed to make cancellation processes faster and more efficient.

While the TPTO began accepting non-use cancellation filings in mid-2024, the absence of detailed procedures caused delays. The amendment of the Regulation now establishes a clear framework for handling these requests.

Key Highlights of the Amendment of the Regulation

1. Filing Process:

  • Non-use cancellation requests must be submitted to the TPTO using a signed form, specifying:

    - Trademark registration number.

    - Goods/services in question.

    - If cancellation is sought as of a specific date, this date must also be specified.

  • Proof of payment of the cancellation fee is required for processing the request.

  • A separate request must be filed for each trademark registration.

2. Proof of Use:

  • Trademark owners must demonstrate genuine and serious use of their trademark in Türkiye for the goods/services subject to the request.

  • Use initiated within three months before the request will be disregarded, if deemed an attempt to avoid cancellation.

3. Deadlines and Responses:

  • If deficiencies in the non-use request are not corrected within one month, the application will be rejected.

  • The TPTO grants a one-month period to trademark owners to respond to cancellation requests, with an optional one-month extension.

  • The TPTO may request additional evidence and information from both parties, with a one-month deadline for responses. If no response is provided, the application will proceed based on the available evidence.

4. Cancellation Fee:

  • The cancellation fee consists of a fee of the TPTO and an escrow fee.

  • Escrow fee is paid to the winning party, if it is asked from the TPTO within ten years as of finalization of the cancelation decision.

5. Withdrawal of Requests:

  • Cancellation requests can be withdrawn before the TPTO issues a decision.

  • Refunds for the escrowed portion of the fee are available upon withdrawal.

What’s Next?

Although the TPTO began accepting non-use cancellation filings in mid-2024, it has not yet started examining these requests. With the new Regulation in place, as of May 2025 the TPTO started notifying trademark owners whose trademarks are challenged with non-use cancellation actions. The TPTO is expected to begin processing applications soon.

This development is a major step toward streamlining the cancellation process, ensuring that unused trademarks no longer block the registry. While the Regulation addresses many procedural uncertainties, additional updates or guidelines are expected to emerge as the TPTO gains experience in implementing the framework.

The amendments mark a significant turning point for IP rights holders, providing clearer procedures and fostering more efficient resolutions for non-use cancellation cases. The text of the amendments to the regulation, which is available only in Turkish can be accessed via the following link.

Author: Ece Berkman - Partner

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Fresh off a string of ITC victories, Latham has recruited Baker Botts’ ITC leader Lisa Kattan, adding another prominent name to one of the market's busiest ITC practices
The firm hopes its recent Düsseldorf expansion and UK partner hire will strengthen its offering as it looks to an integrated model to boost UPC capabilities
Stephenson Harwood’s trademark prosecution push and patent ambitions could complement Taylor Wessing’s remaining but depleted European IP strength following its UK arm’s departure
Gerben IP’s first woman partner, Sophie Edbrooke, explains how boutique life allowed her to broaden her expertise, take on leadership responsibilities and carve out a route to the top
INTA has a right to protect its Annual Meeting, but making it harder for others to hold similar events risks leaving delegates with a bigger travel bill
The firm says it hopes to capture patent litigation work in Texas by arming itself with experienced trial lawyers with venue expertise
Ken Iijima's arrival continues a trend of ex-Pizzeys practitioners joining RnB IP, whose co-founder says independent ownership and a lucrative compensation model have become attractive in a consolidating market
McDermott Will & Schulte lawyers explore why the UPC is seeing rapid adoption by medtech for fast-moving disputes, while pharma and biotech take a cautious, selective approach over revocation risks
IP firms may be growing more comfortable with external capital, but uncertainty over who could ultimately own the business is complicating the investment pitch
The former Western District of Texas judge addresses perceptions of his courtroom, reveals what comes next as he returns to practice at A&O Shearman and explains why marathon running is ‘cathartic’
Gift this article