Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Key contacts
Partner and Chair, Intellectual Property Department: Deepro R. Mukerjee
Quick facts
Established

1974

Number of Partners

16

Number of Practitioners

18

Network Memberships

INTA

Key practice areas
Intellectual property
Trade mark
Patent
Labor and employment
Dispute resolution
Firm overview

Comprehensive worldwide IP protection and strategies.

Katten's IP programs build foundational strength. Our approach is brand immersive and begins with understanding your company and competitive pressures. Industry-rich experience — particularly in apparel and fashion, technology, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, and entertainment — adds practicality and common sense. From start to finish, Katten covers your IP concerns domestically and internationally in:

  • Advertising, marketing and promotions
  • Copyrights and trademarks
  • Enforcement
  • IP-asset secured financings
  • Licensing and related commercial agreements
  • Litigation
  • Patents
  • Portfolio management and counseling
  • Trademarks and trade names
  • Trade secrets
  • Transactions

Securing IP value in deals, in court and across platforms.

Trusted by corporate boardrooms as well as by the artistic forces behind them, we dig deeper than simply what the law or IP search says. Our attorneys are authorities leading the conversation as teachers in law schools and as contributors to Successful Partnering Between Inside and Outside Counsel, Managing Intellectual Property and The Licensing Journal.

Should threats arise to brands, products or services, we protect you swiftly and decisively. We obtain temporary restraining orders to shut down high-profile infringers, navigate multichannel expansion for Fortune 500 brands and secure IP essentials for emerging companies. We also vigorously defend companies against overreaching third-party claims. In the realm of deal making and financings, the influence of IP assets is growing. Katten offers practical insights and guidance in IP valuations and strategies related to:

  • Bankruptcies and restructurings
  • IP-asset secured financings
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Rebrandings

 

Practice Areas & Sector Specialisations

Practice Areas:

  • Copyright
  • IP transactions
  • Patent contentious
  • Patent litigation
  • Patent prosecution
  • Patent strategy & counseling
  • Trade mark contentious
  • Trade mark litigation
  • Trade mark strategy & counseling

 

Sector Expertise:

  • Advertising
  • Computer technology & services
  • Fashion & Luxury Goods
  • Food & beverage
  • ICT & software
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Medical Device
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Retail
Address:
525 West Monroe Street
Chicago 60661-3693
Tel:+1 312 902 5200 Web Address:https://katten.com/
2026 Edition
Trade mark
Highly Recommended
17 firms ranked
View full list

Highly Recommended

Banner Witcoff
3 practice areas
View full profile
Crowell & Moring
6 practice areas
View profile
Katten Muchin Rosenman
5 practice areas
View full profile
Loeb & Loeb
4 practice areas
View profile
Mayer Brown
5 practice areas
View profile
Neal Gerber Eisenberg
3 practice areas
View profile

Recommended

Baker McKenzie
1 practice area
View full profile
Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg
8 practice areas
View profile
Barnes & Thornburg
3 practice areas
View full profile
DLA Piper
3 practice areas
View profile
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath
4 practice areas
View profile
Greenberg Traurig
3 practice areas
View profile
Leydig Voit & Mayer
3 practice areas
View profile
Marshall Gerstein & Borun
3 practice areas
View profile
McDermott Will & Schulte
5 practice areas
View full profile
Michael Best & Friedrich
3 practice areas
View profile
4 results4 results
In the last few years, the US Supreme Court has held that laches is not an available defense to claims for copyright or patent infringement brought within the limited periods described under each of the Copyright and Patent Acts
The US Supreme Court’s ruling in B&B Hardware, Inc v Hargis Industries, Inc provided that courts were obligated to give preclusive effect to decisions made by the US Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) if the ordinary elements of issue preclusion are met
Sponsored

Sponsored