The IP pitfalls and opportunities of bankruptcy

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The IP pitfalls and opportunities of bankruptcy

In a session on bankruptcy, due diligence, and dual filings and assignments at the AIPLA Annual Meeting, panelists spoke of the challenges that IP lawyers face when dealing in bankruptcy and transactional matters.

Though IP lawyers often don’t see bankruptcy as a big part of their practice, Jennifer McCallum of the McCallum Law Firm points out that it is a lucrative and increasingly important field. One reason is that Chapter 11 bankruptcy, sometimes referred to as a reorganization bankruptcy, automatically stays all litigation against the filer. This, McCallum noted, can yield significant tactical advantages in IP cases.

“In Chapter 11, what we’re seeing is that a tech company gets sued for infringement, and it’s a way to stop the case, because it absolutely stops litigation the minute the tech company files,” she said. “They can then put in a claim for liquidating all their intellectual property, or just become a licensing house.” McCallum said: “It’s basically a litigation play.”

The Chapter 11 stay on litigation can pose other challenges for lawyers. For example, because companies have largely run out of money and can’t be sued, there’s a real possibility that their own prosecution counsel will not be paid.

“So if you’re prosecution counsel, stop work,” McCallum warned. “But don’t pay for things because you may not get paid back.”

Companies dealing with business partners undergoing bankruptcy also need to be aware of some of the legal pitfalls. For example, if your company is a creditor to another that is going through bankruptcy, your company may be able to file liens on the debtor’s assets, including its patents and trademarks. However, McCallum notes that lawyers often make mistakes when filing the lien. Most state courts have held that a security interest may be perfected when a lien is filed with the Secretary of State where the debtor is organized. However, because the law is not completely settled, there have been some other decisions which took the position that the lien must be filed with the USPTO to perfect the security interest.

Thus, McCallum says, to be on the safe side, creditors looking to perfect a security interest in a trademark or a patent should file its lien with both the state office and the USPTO.

Bankruptcy can also pose opportunities for rights holders. Companies going through a bankruptcy must file a Schedule B form, which lists all of the company’s assets. Thus, as McCallum explains, if your company wishes to buy the assets, including the IP assets, of a bankrupt competitor, pulling their Schedule B form will list all the assets that you can bid for.

However, buying IP from a bankrupt seller also poses its own challenges. Because the bankrupt company was likely having trouble paying its patent and trademark attorneys, buyers need to be especially careful in their due diligence to make sure that things like maintenance fees or deadlines for applications are all up to date. Failure to identify these issues can cause problems down the road, and courts or the USPTO aren’t likely to excuse these issues on the grounds that it was the previous owner that committed these mistakes.

Despite the challenges that bankruptcy poses, McCallum says that they can be great opportunities for lawyers. This is true even if it’s a client who is going bankrupt – in which case, she advises, the lawyer should contact the bankruptcy trustee and ask to become employed by the bankruptcy trustee. The lawyer has to make a case to be hired (for example, there are a lot of pending applications that cannot be allowed to lapse) and also make an estimate of the costs.

“When there’s no litigation and the economy is kind of down, bankruptcy is up,” she notes. “It’s great to have a practice that’s always busy.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Yossi Sivan explains how Israeli judgment is a pro-brand owner departure from the norm and why it sends a strong message that corporate structures are not always a shield
Halim Shehadeh, group CEO of IP firm CWB, says that in the rush to discuss what AI can do, IP firms are overlooking the more important question of whether they are ready
Caitlin Heard, who formally joined the firm from CMS last month, says she is excited by the ‘energy’ of the London office
Ranjna Mehta-Dutt, who moved to Chadha & Chadha after 25 years at Remfry & Sagar, says the firm plans to expand its life sciences practice through targeted recruitment and dedicated teams for bigger clients
The initial contempt of court claim targeted Stobbs and the firm’s client for allegedly interfering with the administration of justice
Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
Gift this article