INTA Board approves plain packaging resolution

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

INTA Board approves plain packaging resolution

plainpack-sample.jpg

The INTA Board of Directors yesterday approved a policy resolution from the Limits on Trademark Use Subcommittee of the Emerging Issues Committee. The resolution sets forth INTA’s position regarding restrictions on trademark use through plain and standardized product packaging.

INTA’s concern is with various governments enacting or considering enacting plain packaging legislation. The resolution says such legislation is detrimental to consumers, trademark owners and competition.

INTA’s position is that:

  1. 1) Plain and highly standardized packaging measures being considered or imposed by governments should be rejected or repealed since they violate various international treaties and national laws on trademark protection including provisions of the Paris Convention, the Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, and TRIPS.

  2. 2) Governments should use less drastic alternatives to address health and safety goals, such as public educational campaigns which do not violate international and national law and expropriate valuable trademark rights.

INTA submitted an amicus brief in the cases pending at the World Trade Organization (WTO) over Australia’s plain packaging legislation. So far, most of the debate around plain packaging has focused on tobacco but there are concerns the focus will be widened.

“The issue is not about specific products,” INTA CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo told the INTA Daily News. “What is a concern is: where are we going? Today it is tobacco. Tomorrow it could be alcoholic beverages or confectionery. Any legislation should be in agreement with international treaties and should recognize the right of property in trademarks. Moreover, removing the branding could make counterfeiting easier.”

The INTA Board also approved another policy resolution yesterday—“A ‘Material Differences’ Standard for International Exhaustion on Trademark Rights.”

The resolution provides that:

  1. 1) National exhaustion of trademark rights in relation to the parallel importation of goods should be applied; and

  2. 2) In those countries that currently follow international exhaustion, and in which political or other conditions make it highly improbable that national exhaustion would be implemented, a “material differences” standard should be adopted in order to exclude parallel imports that are materially different from those products authorized for sale by the trademark owner in the domestic market.

The two resolutions were passed during the Board’s second quarterly meeting, in which it heard reports from various Board committees, including the Audit, Finance, Compensation & Benefits, Nominating and Planning Committees.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Andrew Blattman reflects on how IP practices have changed and shares his hopes for increased AI use and better performance on the stock market
The firm said major IP developments included advising on a ‘landmark’ deal involving green hydrogen production, as well as two major acquisitions
The appointments follow other recent moves in the European market as firms look to bolster their UPC offerings
Deborah Kirk discusses why IP and technology have become central pillars in transactions and explains why clients need practically minded lawyers
IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals its latest rankings for patent work, including which firms are moving up
Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
Gift this article