Kathi Vidal confirmed as USPTO director; will focus on pro-bono

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Kathi Vidal confirmed as USPTO director; will focus on pro-bono

Kathi Vidal, the USPTO's new director

The Winston & Strawn managing partner and litigator was confirmed by the Senate in a voice vote after more than a year with no director

Kathi Vidal was confirmed as USPTO director by the Senate last night, April 5, in a voice vote.

Now she has been confirmed, Vidal will likely focus on broadening pro-bono programmes at the USPTO, according to office sources.

One source said Vidal highlighted her desire to make this subject one of her priorities during pre-confirmation meetings at the office.

Such a focus would be in-keeping with her record as a private practice lawyer. Vidal was very involved with Winston & Strawn’s pro-bono efforts.

Vidal, a patent litigator and managing partner at Winston & Strawn in California, will come into her new role after more than a year with no nominated USPTO director.

Former director Andrei Iancu stepped down from the role in January 2021. Drew Hirshfeld, the USPTO’s patent commissioner, has been performing the duties and functions of the director since then, essentially serving as an acting director.

Some intellectual property stakeholders were jubilant at the announcement. The Innovation Alliance’s executive director Brian Pomper said: “As a leading patent attorney and intellectual property expert, Ms Vidal brings the kind of experience we need at the USPTO.

“We also believe she has the leadership qualities required to be a successful, even-handed USPTO director.”

Several counsel told Managing IP last year that while Vidal’s nomination was still a rumour, they were desperate to get a new director after such a long time without one.

“Even if someone landed the role who you didn’t agree with, at least you’d know where the office was going and could plan appropriately,” said a head of IP policy at an R&D company.

Vidal was confirmed by the Senate’s Judiciary Committee, along with Leonard Stark for a judgeship at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in January. Stark was confirmed by the full Senate earlier this year.

Before that, the committee grilled the patent litigator on matters related to Section 101, standard essential patents, the Fintiv rule at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and drug pricing.

Vidal was nominated by President Joe Biden on October 26 2021, 10 months after the last director left the role.

In the past, she has spoken to Managing IP about Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the District Court for the Western District of Texas.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Burak Yüceel outlines six characteristics that make a successful IP practitioner and explains why Alan Turing is an inspiration
Lawyers at Dentons unpick the findings of a survey that revealed that businesses tend to focus on reactive rather than proactive use of AI when performing IP evaluations
Peng Lei and David Webb of Herbert Smith Freehills assess what battery innovators need to know to protect their investments
Little to no policies from either candidate suggest we may be waiting a while before we see major changes to the US’s IP framework
Marks & Clerk was accused of receiving ‘secret commissions’ from CPA Global in exchange for securing referrals for IP services
Abion has bought domain services provider Softgarden to complement its trademark and IP offering in Norway
Lawyers at A&O Shearman discuss six clauses typically found in a brand licence and identify the main points to consider
Deborah Kirk will head up Skadden’s IP and technology transactions team
The firm, which recently added high-profile IP lawyer Joel Smith to its cross-disciplinary practice, wants to respond to clients’ shifting demands
Counsel in Germany, Brazil, and Colombia explain what a US ruling on anti-suit injunctions in a FRAND case means for their advice to clients
Gift this article