Opportunities and challenges for India’s medical device market
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Opportunities and challenges for India’s medical device market

Sponsored by


Manisha Singh and Pankaj Musyuni of LexOrbis discuss regulatory changes for medical device companies and the impact of COVID-19 on manufacturers

India is Asia's fourth largest medical device market and one of the top 20 worldwide. According to an Indian Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF) report, the market for medical devices in India is expected to grow at a 35.4% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), with the overall market valued at $11 billion in 2020 and $50 billion by 2025. Imports, on the other hand, currently supply the bulk of the country's medical device market, accounting for 80% of overall sales.

The high reliance on imports presents an appealing opportunity for domestic manufacturers. The 2017 Medical Devices Rules came into effect on January 1 2018, making it the most significant year in terms of regulatory changes for medical device companies.

The government has made changes to the medical equipment legislation to greatly broaden the reach of the regulation. The adoption of new statutory legislation for medical devices is also being discussed, as medical devices are currently classified as drugs under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act.

Impact of COVID-19

The ongoing spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted medical equipment manufacturers. Moreover, the industry faces supply chain disruptions as well as several potential issues that include financial constraints and crises. This revelation highlights the dangers that stem from the dependence on imports because of the lack of domestic competitors in the game.

Despite the ongoing crisis, this opens new avenues of exploration. Prior to the development of medical devices and procedures, the use of these tools was extremely confined to medical facilities that treated many patients at once. With the COVID-19 protocols in place, these devices have become common in small medical institutions. More people are choosing home healthcare, resulting in an increase in demand for medical devices that can be used at home.

Several new factories were built due to the pandemic. For example, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) issued a report in December 2020 stating that prior to COVID-19, the average cost of each ventilator in March 2020 was 15 lakh rupees (approximately $21,000). However, due to the Indian ventilator industry taking up the production, the cost is 2–10 lakh rupees.

In the last nine months, the state/union territory governments have received 36,433 ventilators. Indian ventilators are now available for export without any export restrictions. Also, with a production of 140 million PPE kits, the number of companies had increased to 62, but with a 25.5 million total capacity.

Similarly, the number of masking manufacturer companies increased from 30 to 108. Until March 2020, there were only three N95 mask suppliers that were making fewer than one million per day. Currently, the number of N95 manufacturers and suppliers exceeds 3,000, with a few with BIS certification, and production capacity has increased to more than 8,000 masks per day. A lot of these are also exported from India.

The cost-free N95 respirator supply has already been given to nearly 40 million people. The buffer quantity of N95 masks distributed to the governments has increased from 900,000 in March to 1.46 million while the price has decreased from 40 rupees to 12 rupees.

Regulatory environment

Medical devices manufacturers are interested in setting up a manufacturing facility in India due to the significant population and favourable regulatory climate. Medical device regulations were put in place in 2017, incorporating changes that are at par with global standards. Licenses for the importation, production, or sale, or licencing the use of medical devices were provided and risk-based regulation was introduced. By reducing regulatory requirements, this process has saved both time and money.

The 2017 Medical Device Rules (MDR) will bring all health products under the regulatory purview of both the producers, importers, and suppliers. There are two different risk levels: low risk and medium risk.

For those on the lower level, the low risk, there are 42 months from the date of registration; for those on the higher level, there are 30 months from the first device arrival. The first 18 months of registration will be mandatory; after that, it will be optional. However, once the regulation is put into effect, manufacturers and importers have a strong incentive to register their products as soon as possible.

Currently, MDR covers 16 medical products, with another eight regulated by drug control and 13 by 2021. Industry has been concerned about the sluggish speed of medical device regulation for some time.

While the industry applauds the decision to control all medical devices, stakeholders are concerned about the registration process. Impaired registration processes can lead to sales and business losses for medical equipment suppliers, as well as a supply shortage on the market, putting patients' health and safety in jeopardy. The health ministry released a new draft of the MDR notifications for public consultation in October 2019. Nonetheless, none of the industry feedback was incorporated into the final edition.

A draft risk classification list for medical devices was published by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) through the new definition notification. Using universal classification codes, the list of risk classifications divides medical items into 24 broad categories, with independent software classified as a separate category.

The MDR divides medical devices into four categories: Class A (low risk), Class B (low moderate risk), Class C (moderate high risk), and Class D (high risk). It is the foundation for controlling the system with greater rigour than Class A and B devices, as well as Class C and D devices.

As previously stated, once a medical device is regulated under the MDR, companies involved in the manufacture, import, or selling of medical devices must obtain a licence from the relevant drug regulatory agencies.

Furthermore, controlled medical devices are subject to price limits, and medical equipment companies and importers are either required to price the equipment according to a government-set ceiling price or are prohibited from increasing the price by more than 10% in any 10-month period.

Regulatory compliance and COVID-19 pandemic relief

CDSCO-India has released the following public notices to relieve the Drugs and Cosmetics Act's enforcement requirements.

  • Public notice of the application for import licences, dated April 23 2020, exempts medical device applicants from the requirement to submit notarised/apostilled documents;

  • A public notice dated May 1 2020 that extends the validity of a GMP certificate that expires between March 2020 and August 2020 by six months;

  • A notification dated July 27 2020, under section 26B of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, extends the validity of registration certificates issued to international drug manufacturers seeking to export drugs to India for sale for a period of six months; and

  • A notification dated November 26 2020, under section 26B of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, extends the validity of the import licence granted to importers for a period of six months.

The MoHFW has taken a significant decision to ensure continued access to eight controlled medical devices, taking a constructive and compassionate approach to address the needs of the Indian industry.

The government has made prior announcements regarding regulatory changes regarding the enactment of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act in effect starting April 1 2021, including all implantable medical devices; CT scanners; MRI equipment; defibrillators, PET equipment, dialysis devices, x-ray machines; and bone marrow cell separators.

The way forward

Despite the considerable medical equipment possibilities, the country must retain a stimulating environment for its own production of medical devices in the post-pandemic era. For this industry to have long-term prospects, long-term support is required.

The primary goal of the Indian medical equipment industry should be training and up-enhancement of capabilities. The second goal is to enable access and participation in the needs and supply side of the medical device. The medical device industry has much more room to flourish and a diverse ecosystem of stakeholders, including medical devices, academia, and the government. The goal of the road map should be innovation and research and development.

It is advisable that the government should continue to work with the private sector, investors, and universities to develop the medical device industry in the current situation and post-COVID era. As the medical device industry is still young, creating an efficient ecosystem is critical in terms of the long-term growth of the field. Regulatory and policy reforms, research, and innovation, as well as funding, especially licencing, will lead to the achievement of these goals.

A future-oriented partnership with India will lead to increased confidence in the medical devices sector and will provide better job opportunities.


Manisha Singh

Managing partner


T: +91 11 2371 6565

E: manisha@lexorbis.com

Manisha Singh is a founder and the managing partner of LexOrbis. She oversees and supervises all practice groups at the firm.

Manisha is known and respected for her deep expertise on prosecution and enforcement of all forms of IP rights and for strategising and managing global patents, trademarks and designs portfolios of large global and domestic companies. Her keen interest in using and deploying latest technology tools and processes has immensely helped the firm to develop efficient IP service delivery models and to provide best-in-the-class services.

Manisha studied law at the Campus Law Centre of Delhi University of Delhi after completing her masters’ degree in economics from Patna.


Pankaj Musyuni

Managing associate


T: +91 11 2371 6565

E: pankaj@lexorbis.com

Pankaj Musyuni is a managing associate at LexOrbis. He regularly advises clients on IP strategy and portfolio management.

Pankaj is an advocate registered with the Bar Council of India, as well as a patent agent. He has in-depth knowledge of patent law and regulatory framework and extensive experience in patent filing, drafting, prosecution and advisory matters, especially in the chemical, pharmaceutical and start-up fields.

Pankaj has a master’s degree in pharmaceutical science and management.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

An intimate understanding of a client’s sector is essential to winning new business, a survey of over 28,000 corporate counsel reveals
Counsel say a Federal Circuit ruling on the obviousness test for design patents may increase the time IP owners spend defending their rights
While the INTA Annual Meeting is over for another year, here are a few things Managing IP learned after attending IP’s biggest party
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Four sources reveal which tools they have been using – or building – to help them with a range of tasks from invention generation to claim sufficiency
Managing IP reveals Wednesday's highlights, including a discussion on how AI is helping lawyers improve their "gut instinct" trademark decisions
Managing IP reveals Tuesday’s highlights, including an illuminating discussion celebrating women in the workplace and the challenges that remain
Dana Northcott, INTA’s 2024 president and associate general counsel for Amazon's IP team, talks about her work for the association
Managing IP reveals highlights from the INTA Annual Meeting, including law firms’ diversity and ESG concerns and a new beginning for a Chinese firm
Firms with a broad geographic reach are more likely to win work, especially from global companies with high turnovers, according to survey data of nearly 29,000 corporate counsel
Gift this article