Retroactive effect of trademark law is not applied in practice

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Retroactive effect of trademark law is not applied in practice

Sponsored by

patrinos-logo.png
Trademark written in wooden cubes

During the COVID-19 pandemic, IP practitioners in Greece welcomed the new law on trademarks, under which Directive (EU) 2015/2436 was transposed into national law. There was no reason for any caution in this respect, since the implementation had been awaited since January 12 2019, which was the deadline for Greece to transpose the directive.

It is noteworthy that the new Greek law on trademarks deals with this matter. In the rear provisions of the law, it stipulates that trademark applications that have not been definitively accepted before the date when the new law comes into force, shall be considered pursuant to the trademark law previously applicable, unless such a trademark application was filed on or after January 14 2019.

This is essential information for trademark filers in Greece. This is because under the law previously applicable, all national trademark applications as well as all IP rights designating Greece, received an ex-officio examination both on absolute and relative grounds, while under the new law on trademarks, ex-officio examination is extended to absolute grounds only.

Since the new law on trademarks came into force much later than the above transposition deadline, i.e. on March 20 2020, there should be no issue with the retroactive effect of the above-mentioned provisions regarding trademark registrations. This means that a national trademark application or an IP right designating Greece filed after January 14 2019 should receive an ex-officio examination on the basis of absolute grounds only – correct?

Not correct, says the practice of the Greek Trademark Office. According to the practice of the office all trademark filings between January 12 2019 and March 20 2020 receive an ex-officio examination on both absolute and relative grounds.

This is an unexpected approach, the legitimacy of which will certainly be tested before the Greek courts in the near future. Hopefully, there will be more good news to welcome regarding the new law on trademarks in Greece.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Ranjna Mehta-Dutt, who moved to Chadha & Chadha after 25 years at Remfry & Sagar, says the firm plans to expand its life sciences practice through targeted recruitment and dedicated teams for bigger clients
The initial contempt of court claim targeted Stobbs and the firm’s client for allegedly interfering with the administration of justice
Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
Gift this article