Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

First fine handed out under New Zealand’s three strikes law

The first fine has been issued under New Zealand’s three strikes anti-illegal downloading regime, according to a report in

The unnamed user, who received a fine of NZ $616 ($500), had illegally downloaded Rihanna’s “Man Down” and Hot Chelle Rae’s “Tonight Tonight” for her third strike.

The system, part of the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act, came into effect on September 1 2011. Detection notices are issued for the first and second instances to inform the user that he/she is downloading infringing material. If the user downloads infringing material a third time, an enforcement notice is issued.

Each instance of infringement must be more than 28 days apart. If the user downloads infringing material less than 28 days after a notice is issued, the subsequent action is recorded but there will be no additional notice.

After three notices, the copyright owner may file a complaint to the Copyright Tribunal. The rights owner may seek a fine of up to NZ$15,000 ($12,500). The Act also gives courts discretion to terminate the user’s internet account for up to six months.

Some rights holders have complained about the cost to issue a notice, set at NZ$25 ($20) plus taxes. A spokesperson for the Recording Industry Association of New Zealand (RIANZ) told that it had issued about 6,000 notices since the law came into effect.

Some provisions have not yet come into effect. The three strikes system does not cover mobile internet usage at this time, though it is set to do so on October 1 2013.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Sukanya Sarkar shares her thoughts on this year’s annual meeting in Singapore, where debates ranged from AI opportunities to improving law firm culture
The court’s ruling is a good reminder that US parties aren’t guaranteed attorney fees just because they win, say sources
With business confidence in a shaky state, Rachel Tong and Lisa Yong of Rouse discuss how in-house IP teams can manage their trademark portfolios through uncertain times
The Court of Appeal had stern words for Med-El’s representatives after they highlighted a deputy judge’s background as a solicitor
Funders and NPEs say asserting patent portfolios can minimise risk at the USPTO’s PTAB, where procedure remains a controversial topic
The US Supreme Court’s ruling wasn’t a surprise and reflects a trend that had already been bubbling away for a while, say tech and pharma counsel
Previous attempts at major transatlantic tie-ups have failed, so lawyers will keep their eyes firmly on Allen & Overy’s grand plans
INTA CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo shares his plans if he were to win the EUIPO leadership race and says his application does not affect his INTA role
The French finance minister told António Campinos the timing of an EPO event in Lisbon could be seen as interference in the EUIPO leadership race