Australia opens consultation for patent law amendment

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia opens consultation for patent law amendment

Proposed amendments seek to clarify interpretation and address inconsistencies with TRIPS

The draft changes address two issues: adding an objects clause to the Patents Act and exclusion from patentability for offensive inventions. The Advisory Council on Intellectual Property (ACIP) researched and produced recommendations on both topics.

IP Australia’s consultation paper explains that the objects clause will state the underlying purpose of the patent laws and assist courts and patent examiners in interpretation of the law.

The consultation paper’s first option for the objects clause adopts language used by the ACIP’s 2010 report on patentable subject matter: “he purpose of the legislation as being to provide an environment that promotes Australia’s national interest and enhances the well-being of Australians by balancing the competing interests of patent rights holders, the users of technology, and Australian society as a whole." This language is in turn derived from article 7 of TRIPs.

The proposal also seeks to amend section 50 of Patents Act, which allows the Commissioner of Patents to refuse to grant a patent for an invention where the use is contrary to law. One concern is that section 50 may be contrary to article 27 of TRIPs, which states that a country may not refuse to grant patent protection for an invention “merely because the exploitation is prohibited by their law”.

In response, the ACIP suggests that section 50 be amended to exclude patent protection for “an invention the commercial exploitation which would be wholly offensive to the ordinary reasonable and fully informed member of the Australian public”.

This is the second proposed amendment to Australia’s Patents Act since the Raising the Bar amendments passed last year. In May, the Intellectual Property Laws Amendments Bill 2013 was introduced by the House of Representatives and is under consideration.

IP Australia is seeking public comment on the proposed changes. Submissions may be made to consultation@ipaustralia.gov.au until September 27.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article