Australia opens consultation for patent law amendment
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia opens consultation for patent law amendment

Proposed amendments seek to clarify interpretation and address inconsistencies with TRIPS

The draft changes address two issues: adding an objects clause to the Patents Act and exclusion from patentability for offensive inventions. The Advisory Council on Intellectual Property (ACIP) researched and produced recommendations on both topics.

IP Australia’s consultation paper explains that the objects clause will state the underlying purpose of the patent laws and assist courts and patent examiners in interpretation of the law.

The consultation paper’s first option for the objects clause adopts language used by the ACIP’s 2010 report on patentable subject matter: “he purpose of the legislation as being to provide an environment that promotes Australia’s national interest and enhances the well-being of Australians by balancing the competing interests of patent rights holders, the users of technology, and Australian society as a whole." This language is in turn derived from article 7 of TRIPs.

The proposal also seeks to amend section 50 of Patents Act, which allows the Commissioner of Patents to refuse to grant a patent for an invention where the use is contrary to law. One concern is that section 50 may be contrary to article 27 of TRIPs, which states that a country may not refuse to grant patent protection for an invention “merely because the exploitation is prohibited by their law”.

In response, the ACIP suggests that section 50 be amended to exclude patent protection for “an invention the commercial exploitation which would be wholly offensive to the ordinary reasonable and fully informed member of the Australian public”.

This is the second proposed amendment to Australia’s Patents Act since the Raising the Bar amendments passed last year. In May, the Intellectual Property Laws Amendments Bill 2013 was introduced by the House of Representatives and is under consideration.

IP Australia is seeking public comment on the proposed changes. Submissions may be made to until September 27.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Keith Bergelt, CEO of the Open Invention Network, explains why AI technologies were not part of an update to its cross-licensing project
Kirkland & Ellis partners explain how they secured the dismissal of a patent case in which the other side had lied under oath
Managing IP understands the association had been considering other options, including Madrid or Vienna, after concerns were raised over Dubai’s positions on various rights
Chris Marando tells Managing IP that he's excited to work on PTAB matters at Perkins Coie, which recently hired another lawyer from his former firm
To mark Pride month, Darren Smyth, cochair of IP Out, says the legal profession must not forget that some members still face exclusion and hostility
Lawyers say the opening of the Milan central division this month is likely to boost activity in Italy, which has been modest so far
Sharon Urias tells us why she still has to explain the difference between copyright and trademarks
In the latest episode, Managing IP is joined by Gwilym Roberts and Lee Davies from the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys to discuss the UPC, IP ministers, diversity and more
Lawyers at Tomkins and Bomhard IP explain how they finally secured victory over McDonald’s in long-running ‘Big Mac’ trademark dispute
Technical excellence is paramount for clients looking to hire new advisers, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 corporate counsel
Gift this article