Lights out for Lantana

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Lights out for Lantana

A patent application for software that moves data between computers using email has been held to be unpatentable subject matter under Section 1(2) of the UK Patents Act, which corresponds to Article 52 of the EPC

The patent application ( GB1014714.8 ) was filed by Lantana Ltd and titled “Methods, Systems, and Computer program products for retrieving a file or machine readable data”.

In a judgment on September 4, Mr Justice Birss upheld a UK IPO Office decision that the claim at issue was novel and inventive, but related to unpatentable subject matter.

The case concerned claim 1 of the patent, which the judge summarised as:

two computers connected via the internet. The user of the local computer wants to retrieve data from the remote computer. When required, the local computer creates an email message containing machine-readable retrieval criteria and sends it to the remote computer. The remote computer receives the email, works out if the email contains any machine readable instruction and, if so, executes that instruction, retrieves the data and sends back an e-mail containing the requested data.

Following recent case law on software-related inventions, Birss used the four-step test adopted in the Aerotel case: (1) properly construe the claim; (2) identify the actual contribution; (3) ask whether it falls solely within the excluded subject matter; and (4) check whether the actual or alleged contribution is actually technical in nature.

On appeal, Lantana argued that the invention provided four technical effects and was therefore not excluded. But Birss said he found “nothing which amounts to a technical contribution arising from the claim” in any of the four effects.

“The task the software performs moves data from one computer to another using a conventional technique for carrying out that task, i.e. email. The context in which this arises is that accessing remote computers via continuous connections can be problematic but this is not a technical solution to those problems, it avoids them, but does so using a conventional technique,” wrote the judge.

Lantana was represented by Keith Beresford of Beresford & Co while barrister Tom Mitcheson acted for the UK IPO.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article