Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Google’s head of patents Allen Lo puts the case for reform

Dealing with the patent troll problem in the United States demands tackling both litigation abuse and patent quality, according to Allen Lo of Google

In a wide-ranging interview with Managing IP conducted last week (before the House Judiciary Committee markup of Chairman Goodlatte's Innovation Act yesterday) Lo says it is "well acknowledged" that there is a patent troll problem in the United States.

"When you get to arguments that 'I have a patent, I should be able to do whatever I want with it', it takes you far from the purpose of the system," said Lo. "We've ended up where there are inefficiencies and problems with implementations with how patents are granted and in court the costs and burdens are asymmetrical."

He said that Google/Motorola faces about 100 active troll cases at any time, with the number increasing year on year. The cost of defending this litigation is in the tens of millions of dollars, but Lo claimed it is distraction of engineers and executives that is having a real impact on the company's business.

allen20lo.png

Lo (right), who joined Google in January 2012, welcomed Goodlatte's bill (one of several being discussed in Congress), including the controversial proposal to expand the Covered Business Method programme, which was removed during the mark-up. "Our view is we want a balanced system but also one that addresses the problem, a lot of which is around business method patents," he said.

Asked if it is the case that too many patents are granted, Lo said: "Too many bad patents are being granted. We have not been advocating that patentability standards should be changed, but that existing ones should be applied."

Challenged on whether Google itself owns some of these "bad patents", Lo responded: "We have a large portfolio, so would this affect our patents? I can't say definitively, but it is possible. We are more than willing for our portfolio, which we have paid a lot of money for, to go through the same review process so if we have to enforce a patent it will stand up to the standard of patentability that the courts and Congress have set."

Following the acquisition of Motorola Mobility, Google owns some 50,000 patent assets worldwide and is filing about 4,000 patent applications a year. Lo said it will continue to invest in patents, but added: "We don't have to rapidly build up the portfolio like we did three years ago and we may be able to divest patents if we need to, if it will help our ecosystem to be successful in the marketplace."

Google has been criticised out by opponents of patent reform as a company that is using influence in Washington DC to push for a weaker patent system.

But Lo denied the company was seeking a free ride on other's patents, saying it wants to create more certainty and efficiency in the patent licensing process: "The problem is that demands are unreasonable in terms of what patent owners feel they are entitled to. We're seeing a lot of bad and invalid patents asserted against us. That's the bulk of what we're dealing with."

Read the full transcript of the interview, which also covers the development of Google's patent strategy, some of its own initiatives to deal with patent trolls and Lo's views on standard-essential patents.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Van Anh Le, assistant professor in IP law at Durham University, assesses the US-Vietnam partnership and the potential implications for Vietnam's IP landscape
Civil society and industry representatives met in Geneva on Thursday, September 28 to discuss a potential expansion of the TRIPS waiver
Sources say the beta version of the USPTO’s new trademark search tool is a big improvement over the current system but that it isn’t perfect
Canadian counsel weigh in on the IP office’s decision to raise trademark filing fees in 2024 and how they’re preparing clients
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Shira Perlmutter, US Register of Copyrights, discussed the Copyright Office's role in forming generative AI policy during a House of Representatives hearing
The award marks one of the highest-ever damages received by a foreign company in a trademark infringement suit in China
Two orders denying public access to documents have reignited a debate over a lack of transparency at the new court
Rouse’s new chief of operations and the firm’s CEO tell Managing IP why they think private equity backing will help it conquer Europe
Brian Landry, partner at Saul Ewing, reveals how applicants can prosecute patent applications in the wake of the Federal Circuit's In re Cellect ruling