EPO and USPTO unveil new classification system
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EPO and USPTO unveil new classification system

The EPO and USPTO have launched a new patent classification system, called the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC), as part of efforts to harmonise patent procedures globally

The CPC is effective for both offices from January 2 as a means of classifying technical documents, notably patent publications. It replaces the previous separate systems (known as ECLA and USPC).

The new system is based on the ECLA and comprises some 250,000 symbols. Definitions for every CPC sub-class will be regularly updated.

The CPC has been developed by staff from both offices, including examiners, over the past two years.

EPO President Benoît Battistelli told Managing IP that the work at the EPO involved the equivalent of 150 full-time examiners and the Office has spent €12 million on IT modifications. It has also updated about 10% of all its documents.

The CPC is compatible with the International Patent Classification (IPC) system, used by WIPO and many other patent offices. But it is much more precise, with many more categories.

Classification harmonisation was one of 10 foundation projects agreed by the IP5 offices (EPO, JPO, KIPO, SIPO and USPTO) in 2007.

Battistelli said he was optimistic that KIPO and SIPO would adopt the CPC and it would soon become a global standard. The JPO has its own comprehensive classification system.

He added that improved access to information would benefit users and examiners: “The quality of patents will certainly improve.”

CPC promotional and training events are listed on the CPC website.

Managing IP’s February issue will include in-depth interviews on the CPC with Battistelli and USPTO Director David Kappos

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

James Lawrence, partner at Addisons, explains how he convinced the full Federal Court of Australia to back his client in a patent dispute concerning mining safety equipment
The deal will allow the companies to use each other’s patents covering 4G and 5G technologies, and other cellular SEPs
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Three lead IP counsel in the US, the UK and China share how they walk the fine line between building in-house competence and splurging on external lawyers
Mike Renaud, head of the IP division at Mintz, explains his business strategy and how the firm justifies charging higher rates
Sources say firms must build relationships with clients that transcend their connections to individual partners
INTA’s resolution on online marketplaces and appointment of Amazon’s general counsel follow calls for the association to take a direct position on internet fakes
Counsel report where they’re seeing more issues with inventorship arise and how they’re getting this work in the first place
To mark the firm’s one-year anniversary, partners at Groombridge Wu Baughman & Stone reveal the biggest challenges of getting a new firm off the ground
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career