Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Retired US judges slam AIA

Three retired senior judges have criticised the America Invents Act as a recipe for more litigation and greater confusion about the way the patent system works

The three headlined yesterday’s AIPLA Annual Meeting session, “Patent Litigation Under the AIA.” The session was so packed that the roughly 1,000 attendees overflowed into the hallways surrounding the room.

The panel included former Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Paul Michel, former Administrative Patent Law Judge on the USPTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Judge Nancy Linck, and Judge Joseph Farnan, who retired from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

All three judges were frank in their criticism of the America Invents Act, which Farnan said includes “eye wash, feel-good” remedies for the courts. “This Act is a lot about reining in certain types of patentees, but it doesn’t take a broad brush to reforming the system,” said Farnan. “In district courts, it’s going to be a lot more litigation and confusion,” he added.

Linck questioned why the U.S. decided to adopt a post grant opposition system, which has been an aspect of the systems of many other countries. Although in favor of harmonization, Linck asked: “Why does the U.S. want to pattern its system after other countries when ours is the strongest patent system in the world? Other countries should be lining up with us.”

Michel blamed Congress for the failures of the AIA. He said that while there are some positive provisions in the Act, the bad outweighs the good. He was particularly critical of the post grant review system. “The idea that we can all be confident these proceedings will be done within a year’s time is an illusion,” said Michel. He said that the AIA is “another example of over-intervention by Congress.”

The Federal Circuit’s current Chief Judge, Randall Rader, has expressed concerns about the potential effects of increased volume of cases in light of the AIA on his court as well, particularly since there are currently two vacancies.

Download the AIPLA Daily Report, published by Managing IP from Washington, DC from our conference newspapers page.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Civil society and industry representatives met in Geneva on Thursday, September 28 to discuss a potential expansion of the TRIPS waiver
Sources say the beta version of the USPTO’s new trademark search tool is a big improvement over the current system but that it isn’t perfect
Canadian counsel weigh in on the IP office’s decision to raise trademark filing fees in 2024 and how they’re preparing clients
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Shira Perlmutter, US Register of Copyrights, discussed the Copyright Office's role in forming generative AI policy during a House of Representatives hearing
The award marks one of the highest-ever damages received by a foreign company in a trademark infringement suit in China
Two orders denying public access to documents have reignited a debate over a lack of transparency at the new court
Rouse’s new chief of operations and the firm’s CEO tell Managing IP why they think private equity backing will help it conquer Europe
Brian Landry, partner at Saul Ewing, reveals how applicants can prosecute patent applications in the wake of the Federal Circuit's In re Cellect ruling
Ronelle Geldenhuys of Australia’s Foundry IP considers the implications complex computer technologies such as AI have on decision-making