James Smith, the PTAB’s “managing partner”, pitches for work

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

James Smith, the PTAB’s “managing partner”, pitches for work

james-smith-45.jpg

Chief Administrative Patent Judge James D Smith told the AIPLA Annual Meeting that his job is akin to being managing partner of a first-rate, prominent, multi-city patent law firm awash with work

Keynote speaker Smith described the lunch as similar to a law firm retreat, in which he had the opportunity to convince clients why they should keep sending work to his firm and his judges/partners. And in a speech-long analogy, he did just that.

James-Smith-PTAB

Why did he describe the “PTAB firm” as first-rate, he asked? Because one measure of first-rate firms is their clients. “I believe many of you here are among them,” Smith said. “And I refuse to think of any of you as less than first rate.”

The Chief Judge then went on to explain why patent attorneys in the room should not be tempted to take their work elsewhere.

“We’ll assign three qualified “partners” to each of your cases. Which of your firms can say that?” he asked, to laughter from the audience.

He said that his “firm” was expanding to keep up with its growing workload, bringing in new “partners” to help PTAB bring 10,200 matters to completion in FY2012. He reassured his “clients” that the new hires were more than up to the job, explaining that over 1100 people had applied for the new “partnership” positions and that a typical new hire has a Ph.D. and/or a J.D. qualification, has clerked for a judge and has more than 10 years’ legal practice.

Smith then explained his “firm’s” expansion plans, revealing that its new Dallas-Fort Worth, Denver and Silicon Valley offices are set to have at least 12 partners in place by FY2013.

Finally he raised the issue of fees. “I was hoping you were going to ask me that,” he joked, adding that in the past, the fees for ex parte proceedings were less than it cost the Office to run them. “We hope to reduce our losses. It’s all about correct decisions being delivered quickly. Ultimately we’re looking to keep and expand the work we perform for you.”

Download the AIPLA Daily Report, published by Managing IP from Washington, DC from our conference newspapers page.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article