Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Singapore: New fee structure aims to foster innovation

The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) announced a fee revision for patents and trade marks with effect from April 1 2017. Regarding patents, the application fees for searches or supplementary search reports, local search and examination reports, and international search and examination reports, are reduced by 14%, 25% and 37%, respectively. There is also a 30% fee reduction in the application to register trade marks that utilise the IPOS pre-approved list of goods and services. Thus, businesses and entrepreneurs will see a substantial fee reduction for patent and trade mark applications.

In addition, a new excess claim fee structure is introduced that is payable when requesting combined search and examination (S&E), examination (E) and grant. Previously, excess claim fees were only payable at time of grant. With the revised fees, $40 is charged per claim in excess of 20 claims when requesting S&E or E and is payable together with a grant fee for claims in excess of the number of claims previously paid (i.e. only the excess unpaid claims will be charged on grant). The changes to the claim fee structure will streamline the patent application process at IPOS and encourage applicants to file claims sets that are concise with the aim of saving costs and time required for the patent application process.

The fee revision also includes an increase in patent renewal fees from the eighth year onwards and an increase in trade mark renewal fees. While this renewal fee revision increases the overall lifecycle costs for patents and trade marks in Singapore, Singapore continues to remain competitive with lower overall lifecycle costs as compared to other countries such as Korea, Japan, China, the USA and Australia.

According to IPOS, the increase in renewal fees will discourage IP hoarding by encouraging IP owners to utilise their valuable IP while releasing non-performing IP to the public domain. To further facilitate this initiative, the fees for surrendering or cancelling IP are removed. Additionally, applicants who license their patents will enjoy a 50% discount off their renewal fees. Thus businesses are encouraged to manage their IP portfolio strategically.


Shahera Anwar

Daniel Collopy

Spruson & Ferguson (Asia) Pte Ltd152 Beach Road#37-05/06 Gateway EastSingapore 189721Tel: +65 6333 7200Fax: +65 6333

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Civil society and industry representatives met in Geneva on Thursday, September 28 to discuss a potential expansion of the TRIPS waiver
Sources say the beta version of the USPTO’s new trademark search tool is a big improvement over the current system but that it isn’t perfect
Canadian counsel weigh in on the IP office’s decision to raise trademark filing fees in 2024 and how they’re preparing clients
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Shira Perlmutter, US Register of Copyrights, discussed the Copyright Office's role in forming generative AI policy during a House of Representatives hearing
The award marks one of the highest-ever damages received by a foreign company in a trademark infringement suit in China
Two orders denying public access to documents have reignited a debate over a lack of transparency at the new court
Rouse’s new chief of operations and the firm’s CEO tell Managing IP why they think private equity backing will help it conquer Europe
Brian Landry, partner at Saul Ewing, reveals how applicants can prosecute patent applications in the wake of the Federal Circuit's In re Cellect ruling
Ronelle Geldenhuys of Australia’s Foundry IP considers the implications complex computer technologies such as AI have on decision-making