Argentina: Double protection for industrial models and designs
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: Double protection for industrial models and designs

As previously explained in our October 2016 briefing, industrial models and designs consist of the shape or ornamental aspect of industrial products.

Decree No 6,673/63 ratified by Law No 16,478 regulates the legal protection of industrial models and designs through the industrial law.

However, under the Argentine Law, it is also possible - in certain cases - to protect the models and designs under Law 11,723 of Intellectual Property (Copyright), which refers to "models and works of art or science applied to commerce or industry", when the drawings or models are substantially covered in their aesthetic aspect. If this creation may still be considered a work even after being dissociated from the product, the custody of the work may be claimed in virtue of the copyright law.

It should be borne in mind that even though double protection is possible under Section 28 of Decree 6,673/63 when a model or industrial design registered according to the above-mentioned decree may have also been registered under Law 11,723, the author may not claim them simultaneously in the judicial defence of his rights.

However, protection under one rule or the other has consequences in the terms: if the work is protected under Decree 6,673/63, the term shall be five years extendible for two periods; but protection based on copyright law remains in effect during the entire life of the author, plus 70 years counted from January 1 of the year following the author's death.

Daniel R Zuccherino

Obligado & Cia

Paraguay 610, 17th Floor

C1057AAH, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Tel: +54 11 4114 1100

Fax: +54 11 4311 5675

admin@obligado.com.ar

www.obligado.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers weigh in on the USPTO’s request for comment on the effects of AI on prior art analysis and obviousness determinations
A vast majority of corporates – especially smaller businesses – rely on a trusted referral when instructing external counsel, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Munich Regional Court ruled that Lenovo was an unwilling licensee and had engaged in ‘holdout’ tactics
Technological innovation should play a critical role in advancing sustainable practices, argues Justin Delfino, global head of IP and R&D at Evalueserve
Ewan Grist of Bird & Bird, who acted for Lidl in its trademark victory against Tesco, reveals some of the lessons brand owners can take from the judgment
Dolby’s lawsuit at the Delhi High Court follows a record win by Ericsson earlier this year against the same defendant
Tee Tan, chief information officer at the owner of several IP firms, says to avoid tech just for the sake of it and explains how his company builds in-house tools
Regardless of whether the FTC’s ban on non-competes goes into effect, businesses should stop relying on these agreements
Mary Till, a former legal advisor at the USPTO who has joined Finnegan this week, is looking forward to providing clients with a USPTO perspective
Gift this article