Politicians urge Obama to allow public review of IP provisions in TPP

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Politicians urge Obama to allow public review of IP provisions in TPP

Six members of US Congress have written to US President Barack Obama expressing concern that "secret" negotiations over intellectual property in the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement benefit pharmaceutical companies at the expense of public health.

The six Democrats - Jan Schakowsky (Illonois), Michael Michaud (Maine), Rosa DeLauro (Conneticut), George Miller (California), Barbara Lee (California) and Peter Welch (Vermont) - said the current proposals would have "profound and long-lasting consequences".

In the letter, sent yesterday, the Members urged Obama not to make any final trade agreements "that affect critical health issues" until members of the public and Congress have had the opportunity to review the provisions and provide input.

In particular, they argued that proposed provisions relating to data exclusivity, patent registration and procedure and enforcement would "delay generic competition and increase the price of medicine" and lead to "preventable illnesses and deaths".

"Certainly, trade negotiations conducted behind closed doors are not the place to make changes that would have such profound consequences for patents and veterans, as well as state and federal budgets," they wrote.

Although the TPP negotiations were meant to have been conducted in secret, whistleblowing website WikiLeaks has released several documents which suggest the US is exerting "great pressure" on other nations to adopt stricter IP policies. In the latest release, yesterday, WikiLeaks published two leaked documents that suggest that the US is isolated in its positions on many IP policies.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
Gift this article