Politicians urge Obama to allow public review of IP provisions in TPP

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Politicians urge Obama to allow public review of IP provisions in TPP

Six members of US Congress have written to US President Barack Obama expressing concern that "secret" negotiations over intellectual property in the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement benefit pharmaceutical companies at the expense of public health.

The six Democrats - Jan Schakowsky (Illonois), Michael Michaud (Maine), Rosa DeLauro (Conneticut), George Miller (California), Barbara Lee (California) and Peter Welch (Vermont) - said the current proposals would have "profound and long-lasting consequences".

In the letter, sent yesterday, the Members urged Obama not to make any final trade agreements "that affect critical health issues" until members of the public and Congress have had the opportunity to review the provisions and provide input.

In particular, they argued that proposed provisions relating to data exclusivity, patent registration and procedure and enforcement would "delay generic competition and increase the price of medicine" and lead to "preventable illnesses and deaths".

"Certainly, trade negotiations conducted behind closed doors are not the place to make changes that would have such profound consequences for patents and veterans, as well as state and federal budgets," they wrote.

Although the TPP negotiations were meant to have been conducted in secret, whistleblowing website WikiLeaks has released several documents which suggest the US is exerting "great pressure" on other nations to adopt stricter IP policies. In the latest release, yesterday, WikiLeaks published two leaked documents that suggest that the US is isolated in its positions on many IP policies.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
A team from White & Case has checked in on behalf of Premier Inn Hotels in a UK trademark and passing off case against a cookie brand
Litigation team says pre-trial work and a Section 101 defence helped significantly limit damages payable by ride-sharing firm Lyft in patent case
News of Avanci hiring a senior vice president and the EPO teaming up with a French AI startup were also among the top talking points
Explosm, the independent Texas studio behind the hit webcomic Cyanide & Happiness, partnered with Temu’s IP protection team to combat counterfeiters infringing on its brand
The latest in a dispute over juicing machines, and a shakeup in judicial compositions were also among the top developments
Patent partner Robert Hollingshead explains why the firm remains committed to Japan despite several US firms exiting the Japanese and greater Asia market
Emma Green, partner at Bird & Bird, shares why the Iceland v Iceland dispute could prompt businesses and lawyers to think differently about brand enforcement
Gift this article