Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Search results for

There are 42,955 results that match your search.42,955 results
  • Two recent Taiwan IP Court decisions allowed non-infringement declaratory judgment actions for the first time. Victor Lee, Parkson Hsu and Pei-Ling Tong of Tsai Lee & Chen examine the use of this legal tool
  • Jerry Lin of Tai E offers a case study in the changing practice of amending post-granted patents
  • Erica Poon spoke with Wang Mei-Hua, director-general of the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office, on relations with mainland China, backlogs and proposed reforms
  • Hsiaoling Fan at Formosa Transnational Attorneys at Law looks at the promising new Cross-Strait IPR Agreement between China and Taiwan
  • According to the Polish Industrial Property Law, any person may give a reasoned notice of opposition to a final decision of the Patent Office on the grant of a right of protection within six months from publication of the grant in the Polish Patent Office Bulletin. Non-compliance with the six-month deadline renders an opposition completely ineffective. Within the statutory six months the opponent is bound to specify the legal basis for the opposition, together with substantiation of it. If necessary, the opposition may have to be completed or supplemented upon the Polish Patent Office's request. It is not obligatory for the opponent to prove one's legal interest, however filing the opposition is limited to a strict time frame: if six months from the grant passes, the opportunity to oppose is no longer available. The opposition procedure is available to any party that is able to prove that for some reason granting the protection right for a trade mark has violated the law.
  • In an uncharacteristic ruling, the Supreme Court has said that so-called wilful blindness is the proper standard for determining induced patent infringement
  • The US Supreme Court’s ruling in Global Tech v SEB has allowed plaintiffs more flexibility in proving inducement in infringement suits, said lawyers
  • Most in-house counsel are planning to register an internationalised domain name (IDN), according to an online survey
  • The pending launch of the new gTLD programme will change the way businesses protect their online identities
  • The G8 included two paragraphs asserting support for IP rights in its declaration last week. Though abstract, they highlight the areas most likely to be targeted by future legislation
777
of
4296