Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Search results for

There are 43,004 results that match your search.43,004 results
  • Carey Ramos has left his post at Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison to join Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan’s New York office.
  • The Raising the Bar initiative at the EPO has – via a number of changes in the Implementing Regulations and EPO Guidelines – attempted to streamline examination. Among other things, the introduction of new EPC Rules 62a, 63 and 70a attempt to introduce elements of examination at the search phase, so that when a patent application reaches the Examining Division, it should be clear what the invention is, what is claimed and what has been searched.
  • The General Court of the EU recently found that the Commission infringed the copyright and know-how of Systran machine-translation software. To sanction this behaviour, on December 16, 2010 it ordered the Commission to pay Systran liquidated damages of €12.001 million.
  • Wragge & Co has hired IP litigator Tom Carver as the new director of the firm’s office in Guangzhou.
  • A UK Court has asked the Court of Justice of the EU to clarify questions relating to jurisdiction and the EU database directive
  • Patent applications may be filed at the German Patent and Trademark Office (GPTO) in a language other than German, provided that a full translation of the foreign language application is filed within three months from the filing date. According to Section 35 of the German Patent Act, the application is deemed not to have been filed if a complete translation is not filed in time.
  • The Delhi High Court, in Tata Sons v Greenpeace, recently denied interim injunction to Tata Sons, in an action that sought a permanent injunction and damages amounting to Rs100 million ($2.17 million) against Greenpeace. Tata has initiated an action for infringement of trade mark and defamation and disparagement against Greenpeace. The cause of action for the case arose from a game, modeled around the popular Pac-man game, named Turtle v TATA, that depicts turtles being chased by the Tata logo. The game was intended to raise awareness on the alleged adverse impact of the Dhamra Port Project, a joint venture project between Tata Sons and Larsen and Toubro, on Olive Ridley turtles.
  • Along with the development of science and technology that affects economic competition in the global market, and to implement the provisions of International Treaties, in 2010 the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights of the Department of Justice and Human Rights prepared a draft amendment to law number 14 of 2001 concerning patents. Its main purpose is to provide an ordinance to protect the interests of the inventor of patents and improvements in the Patent Law Regulations.
  • WIPO has published a 2.0 version of its overview of UDRP proceedings, which plays an important role in shaping UDRP arguments and decisions
  • UK patent attorney firm Venner Shipley has launched an iPhone app.
664
of
4301