IP review calls for evidence submissions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

IP review calls for evidence submissions

IP practitioners have until March 1 to submit evidence to the UK's latest IP review

On Friday the IP Office published a call for evidence for the Review, to be led by Professor Ian Hargreaves.

The review will focus on intellectual property and growth, and it has three main aims: to outline the key elements of an IP systems that would promote UK economic growth; to set out first steps towards this goal; and to identify areas with potential for improvement where further evidence is needed.

The Review will cover all IP rights, but will focus on patents and copyright.

The call for evidence states: "We would like to hear about your experience of the current IP framework and your assessment of how well it promotes these objectives."

The four subjects likely to be covered in the Review are: IP and barriers to new internet-based models; cost and complexity of enforcement; interaction of IP and competition; and cost and complexity to SMEs.

The Review is due to be finished in April next year.

Anyone considering submitting a response should bear in mind that the Review encourages "economic data and related evidence which are methodologically sound, robust and clearly sourced" as well as "evidence in the form of case-studies and individual experiences which illustrate one or more of the issues under consideration".

It also welcomes evidence relating both to how the system operates as well as possible alternatives.

The call for evidence sets out a series of questions that correspondents can address. There are nine questions concerning patents, nine relating to copyright, seven on enforcement, and two each on IP and competition and SMEs.

Responses can be submitted electronically or by post.

Responses will be posted on the Review website when they are received, unless they are marked as confidential.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, ELTEMATE
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
François Pochart, Grégoire Desrousseaux and Lionel Martin, long-standing figures in the firm’s patent litigation team, are set to help launch a Paris-based litigation offering
The Unitary Patent has passed 100,000 registrations, but new data raises the question of whether 30% uptake is a ceiling or a staging post for further growth, say Michael Nielsen and Darren Smyth of EIP and Andrew Samm at Patently
The new generation of in-house IP leaders want commercial judgment, accessibility and flexibility, with AI raising expectations around both fees and delivery
Gift this article