Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

This law firm has not supplied any contact details or supplementary information for this country or region. For more information about profiling options please contact Prin Shasiharan.
2026 Edition
Patent
Tier 1
13 firms ranked
View full list

Tier 1

Baker McKenzie
6 practice areas
View full profile
Domnern Somgiat & Boonma
3 practice areas
View full profile
Tilleke & Gibbins
7 practice areas
View profile

Tier 2

Rouse
3 practice areas
View full profile
Satyapon & Partners
3 practice areas
View full profile

Tier 3

Ananda Intellectual Property
3 practice areas
View full profile
ILCT
4 practice areas
View profile
LawPlus
4 practice areas
View profile
SCL Nishimura & Asahi
8 practice areas
View profile
ZICO IP
7 practice areas
View profile

Other Notable Firms

Lexpertise Law Firm
5 practice areas
View full profile
S&I International Bangkok
4 practice areas
View profile
TMP Intellectual Property
4 practice areas
View profile
Trade mark
Tier 1
15 firms ranked
View full list

Tier 1

Baker McKenzie
6 practice areas
View full profile
Domnern Somgiat & Boonma
3 practice areas
View full profile
Tilleke & Gibbins
7 practice areas
View profile

Tier 2

Ananda Intellectual Property
3 practice areas
View full profile
Rouse
3 practice areas
View full profile
Satyapon & Partners
3 practice areas
View full profile

Tier 3

ILCT
4 practice areas
View profile
LawPlus
4 practice areas
View profile
SCL Nishimura & Asahi
8 practice areas
View profile
TMP Intellectual Property
4 practice areas
View profile

Other Notable Firms

ILAWASIA
8 practice areas
View profile
JTJB International Lawyers
8 practice areas
View profile
Lexpertise Law Firm
5 practice areas
View full profile
S&O
2 practice areas
View profile
ZICO IP
7 practice areas
View profile
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
Tilleke & Gibbins’s Indonesia director explains why the firm’s regional presence is a blessing, the threat posed by new practices, and where she sees opportunities
An intervention by Dyson into the UK’s patent box regime and a report unveiling the major SEP owners were among the big talking points this week
King & Wood Mallesons took home the Asia-Pacific Domestic Law Firm of the Year award, while Baker McKenzie emerged a clear winner among foreign firms
Sponsored

Sponsored

MIP Sponsored

  • Sponsored by Tilleke & Gibbins
    Traditional IP enforcement measures are sometimes ill-equipped to deal with the rapidly evolving nature of internet resources in the digital era. Thailand has been responding to the exponential rise of online IP infringement on a rolling basis – most recently in 2017 when it amended the Computer Crime Act (CCA) to give IP owners the option of blocking websites that post IP-infringing content. This is set out in Section 20(3) of the law.
  • Sponsored by Tilleke & Gibbins
    The Myanmar Customs Department (MCD) organised another Intellectual Property Awareness and Product Identification Workshop at its Customs Training School in Yangon on August 6 2020, for its frontline customs officers. Such workshops are held several times every year, serving as a platform for foreign brand owners and their local representatives to educate and update the enforcement officers on methods for differentiating their genuine products from counterfeits and imitations when inspecting suspicious shipments at ports of entry into the country. The training sessions are also useful in encouraging collaborative discourse between the private and public sectors to improve the efficiency of their joint intellectual property rights enforcement efforts.
  • Sponsored by Tilleke & Gibbins
    With many employees in Thailand working outside their company's normal IT security fence, their increased use of their own computers and devices instead of those in their offices with standard or enhanced security mechanisms has made it more challenging for employers to control access to key business information. In the rush to set up a fully or partially remote workforce, most companies have had little time to establish work-from-home guidelines on protection of their valuable intangible assets like trade secrets and confidential business information. The need for sufficient internal guidelines on copying files to USB drives, emailing files to personal accounts, and uploading to cloud storage is already widely recognised, but who could have imagined the need for rules precluding sharing proprietary information over Zoom, Skype, Webex, and such programs?