Managing IP’s China IP Special Focus 2022 launched

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Managing IP’s China IP Special Focus 2022 launched

editorial-adobestock-16451032.jpg

Managing IP has partnered with leading IP experts to share knowledge and solutions on China’s IP landscape in 2022

The fourth amendment to China’s Patent Law came into force on June 1 2021 reflecting the need to strengthen IP protection. There are many highlights of this revision that the IP experts will explore in depth as well as a wide range of other relevant developments in China’s IP terrain.

AFD China Intellectual Property Law Office discuss the development of the law regarding OEMs and trademark infringement in China while Beijing East IP consider why adopting and promoting a Chinese equivalent of a foreign language mark is critical for foreign businesses to shine in China’s market.

Administrative actions are an important tool for IP protection in China. CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office discuss how they can be used in practice and what advantages they offer. Chang Tsi & Partners explain why Chinese enterprises dealing with SEP litigation should respond actively to ensure the issue is litigated before the Chinese courts.

DEQI Intellectual Property’s article focusses on why the patent prosecution highways programme is the most and active international cooperation programme in patent examination around the world. While Kangxin explain why applicants and patentees should understand the functionality of the compensation system for the patent protection term

Liu Shen & Associates provide an analysis of IP cases decided by China’s Supreme Court and consider the characteristics of each. Panawell & Partners explain why the patent evaluation report plays an important role in patent infringement litigation.

Vivien Chan & Co explain how brand owners can benefit from the changes introduced by the CNIPA including reducing bad faith filings and Wanhuida Intellectual Property provide an insight into obtaining evidence on the infringing product/process and the calculation of damages in China.

We hope you enjoy hearing from the IP experts on a wide range of topics in the China IP Special Focus 2022.

Click here to read all the chapters from Managing IP's China IP Special Focus 2022 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article