This content is from: Patents

Inventorship: why AI is not smart enough yet

Matthew Horton and Austin Kim of Foley & Lardner examine the implications of a recent USPTO decision that said artificial intelligence cannot be an inventor on a patent

To access our in-house intelligence please request a trial here.

Read this article – and more – for a 30 day period.


Are you already an Managing IP subscriber? Login here


Instant access to all of our content. Membership Options | 30 Day Trial