This content is from: Patents
Inventorship: why AI is not smart enough yet
Matthew Horton and Austin Kim of Foley & Lardner examine the implications of a recent USPTO decision that said artificial intelligence cannot be an inventor on a patent
To access our in-house intelligence please request a trial here.
Read this article – and more – for a 30 day period.
REQUEST ACCESSAre you already an Managing IP subscriber? Login here