Changes afoot for Hague System

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Changes afoot for Hague System

AIPPI Congress attendees were updated on the changes underway for designs and the Hague System during an IP Lunch Panel yesterday

Christian Archambeau, vice-president at the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM), gave the keynote speech. He noted an increasing acceptance of the importance of registered Community designs since they became available in 2003. OHIM receives 95,000 design applications a year, with 10,000 applications coming through the Hague System. “Even though the international route is not as fast, it has become increasingly popular,” noted Archambeau.

He added: “But for design rights to reach their full potential, greater efforts need to be made to reach international agreements on terms and definitions.” He said further work is also required to create interfaces with effective search facilities. There have been particular challenges around image searches. “We will be working proactively with all our partners to reach this goal,” he said.

Archambeau was followed by Grégoire Bisson (pictured), director at The Hague Registry. He referenced a WIPO report that found that trade mark and patent applications increased almost 50% between 2004 and 2012 but international design applications were up 110%.

He said the Hague System is a “one-stop shop” but is a “fairly Euro-centric system at present”. Until South Korea’s ascension to the Hague System in July, there was little action from Asia. “All of this is about to change,” said Bisson. “Stay tuned – it is going to become a big system very soon.”

This is because the United States, Japan, China, Mexico and Canada all have efforts underway to join. “This is going to transform the system entirely,” said Bisson. “Not only geographically speaking but also in the way it operates. Why? Because most of these forthcoming jurisdictions – and this is definitely true of Japan, China and United States – have a novelty examination system under their design law. So it means applicants are going to need to comply with more requirements. They will need to provide more information in their Hague application.”

“Those of you who currently use the system will have noticed we launched last year a new e-filing interface. It contains embedded intelligence, so in the future as these countries join and we require more and more information from you, the e-filing interface will ask you for that information,” said Bisson.

He said with all this change going on, “we need to let things stabilise a little bit as more countries join so that we can all see how aligned practices are between the various offices”. That will also make the system more complex, he said: “Applicants in future may need to be more savvy when making a Hague application. The old days of just going tick, tick, tick, I want all of these countries is probably gone. And that’s not a bad thing.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article